Department of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, 227 East 30th Street, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
VA NY Harbor Healthcare System, New York, NY, 10010, USA.
J Behav Med. 2017 Oct;40(5):750-759. doi: 10.1007/s10865-017-9844-0. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
Hospital patients with serious mental illness (SMI) have high rates of smoking. There are few post-discharge treatment models available for this population and limited research on their treatment uptake following discharge. This study is a secondary analysis of an RCT that compared multi-session intensive telephone counseling versus referral to state quitline counseling at two safety net hospitals in New York City. For this analysis, we selected all trial participants with a history of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder or bipolar disorder (N = 384) and used multivariable logistic regression to compare groups on self-reported 30-day abstinence at 6 months and to identify patient factors associated with use of tobacco treatment. Analyses found no significant group differences in abstinence 6 months (28% quitline vs. 29% intervention, p > 0.05), use of cessation medications (42% quitline vs. 47% intervention, p > 0.05) or receipt of at least one counseling call (47% quitline vs. 42% intervention, p > 0.05). Patients with hazardous drinking (p = 0.04) or perceived good health (p = 0.03) were less likely to use cessation medications. Homeless patients were less likely to use counseling (p = 0.02). Most patients did not use cessation treatment after discharge, and the intensive intervention did not improve abstinence rates over quitline referral. Interventions are needed to improve use of cessation treatment and long-term abstinence in patients with SMI.
住院的严重精神疾病(SMI)患者吸烟率较高。针对该人群,很少有出院后的治疗模式,并且针对他们出院后的治疗参与度的研究也有限。本研究是对一项 RCT 的二次分析,该 RCT 比较了在纽约市两家安全网医院对多疗程强化电话咨询与转介至州戒烟热线咨询的效果。在这项分析中,我们选择了所有有精神分裂症、分裂情感障碍或双相情感障碍病史的试验参与者(N=384),并使用多变量逻辑回归比较了两组在 6 个月时报告的 30 天戒烟率,并确定与使用烟草治疗相关的患者因素。分析发现,两组在 6 个月时的戒烟率(28%戒烟热线组与 29%干预组,p>0.05)、戒烟药物的使用(42%戒烟热线组与 47%干预组,p>0.05)或至少接受一次咨询电话(47%戒烟热线组与 42%干预组,p>0.05)方面无显著差异。有危险饮酒(p=0.04)或自感健康状况良好(p=0.03)的患者更不可能使用戒烟药物。无家可归的患者更不可能接受咨询(p=0.02)。大多数患者在出院后没有使用戒烟治疗,强化干预并没有提高戒烟热线转介患者的戒烟率。需要干预措施来提高 SMI 患者对戒烟治疗的使用和长期戒烟率。