Suppr超能文献

长期戒烟和预测因素的烟草治疗参与住院吸烟者严重精神疾病纳入一项戒烟试验。

Long-term abstinence and predictors of tobacco treatment uptake among hospitalized smokers with serious mental illness enrolled in a smoking cessation trial.

机构信息

Department of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, 227 East 30th Street, New York, NY, 10016, USA.

VA NY Harbor Healthcare System, New York, NY, 10010, USA.

出版信息

J Behav Med. 2017 Oct;40(5):750-759. doi: 10.1007/s10865-017-9844-0. Epub 2017 Mar 27.

Abstract

Hospital patients with serious mental illness (SMI) have high rates of smoking. There are few post-discharge treatment models available for this population and limited research on their treatment uptake following discharge. This study is a secondary analysis of an RCT that compared multi-session intensive telephone counseling versus referral to state quitline counseling at two safety net hospitals in New York City. For this analysis, we selected all trial participants with a history of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder or bipolar disorder (N = 384) and used multivariable logistic regression to compare groups on self-reported 30-day abstinence at 6 months and to identify patient factors associated with use of tobacco treatment. Analyses found no significant group differences in abstinence 6 months (28% quitline vs. 29% intervention, p > 0.05), use of cessation medications (42% quitline vs. 47% intervention, p > 0.05) or receipt of at least one counseling call (47% quitline vs. 42% intervention, p > 0.05). Patients with hazardous drinking (p = 0.04) or perceived good health (p = 0.03) were less likely to use cessation medications. Homeless patients were less likely to use counseling (p = 0.02). Most patients did not use cessation treatment after discharge, and the intensive intervention did not improve abstinence rates over quitline referral. Interventions are needed to improve use of cessation treatment and long-term abstinence in patients with SMI.

摘要

住院的严重精神疾病(SMI)患者吸烟率较高。针对该人群,很少有出院后的治疗模式,并且针对他们出院后的治疗参与度的研究也有限。本研究是对一项 RCT 的二次分析,该 RCT 比较了在纽约市两家安全网医院对多疗程强化电话咨询与转介至州戒烟热线咨询的效果。在这项分析中,我们选择了所有有精神分裂症、分裂情感障碍或双相情感障碍病史的试验参与者(N=384),并使用多变量逻辑回归比较了两组在 6 个月时报告的 30 天戒烟率,并确定与使用烟草治疗相关的患者因素。分析发现,两组在 6 个月时的戒烟率(28%戒烟热线组与 29%干预组,p>0.05)、戒烟药物的使用(42%戒烟热线组与 47%干预组,p>0.05)或至少接受一次咨询电话(47%戒烟热线组与 42%干预组,p>0.05)方面无显著差异。有危险饮酒(p=0.04)或自感健康状况良好(p=0.03)的患者更不可能使用戒烟药物。无家可归的患者更不可能接受咨询(p=0.02)。大多数患者在出院后没有使用戒烟治疗,强化干预并没有提高戒烟热线转介患者的戒烟率。需要干预措施来提高 SMI 患者对戒烟治疗的使用和长期戒烟率。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验