Smyth Alan R, Bhatt Jayesh, Nevitt Sarah J
Division of Child Health, Obstetrics & Gynaecology (COG), School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queens Medical Centre, Derby Road, Nottingham, UK, NG7 2UH.
Paediatric Respiratory Medicine, Nottingham University Hospitals, QMC Campus, Derby Road, Nottingham, UK, NG7 2UH.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 27;3(3):CD002009. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002009.pub6.
People with cystic fibrosis, who are chronically colonised with the organism Pseudomonas aeruginosa, often require multiple courses of intravenous aminoglycoside antibiotics for the management of pulmonary exacerbations. The properties of aminoglycosides suggest that they could be given in higher doses less often. This is an update of a previously published review.
To assess the effectiveness and safety of once-daily versus multiple-daily dosing of intravenous aminoglycoside antibiotics for the management of pulmonary exacerbations in cystic fibrosis.
We searched the Cystic Fibrosis Specialist Register held at the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's editorial base, comprising references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches, handsearching relevant journals and handsearching abstract books of conference proceedings.Date of the most recent search: 24 June 2016.
All randomised controlled trials, whether published or unpublished, in which once-daily dosing of aminoglycosides has been compared with multiple-daily dosing in terms of efficacy or toxicity or both, in people with cystic fibrosis.
The two authors independently selected the studies to be included in the review and assessed the risk of bias of each study; authors also assessed the quality of the evidence using the GRADE criteria. Data were independently extracted by each author. Authors of the included studies were contacted for further information. As yet unpublished data were obtained for one of the included studies.
Fifteen studies were identified for possible inclusion in the review. Four studies reporting results from a total of 328 participants (aged 5 to 50 years) were included in this review. All studies compared once-daily dosing with thrice-daily dosing. One study had a low risk of bias for all criteria assessed; the remaining three included studies had a high risk of bias from blinding, but for other criteria were judged to have either an unclear or a low risk of bias.There was no significant difference between treatment groups in: forced expiratory volume in one second, mean difference 0.33 (95% confidence interval -2.81 to 3.48, moderate quality evidence); forced vital capacity, mean difference 0.29 (95% confidence interval -6.58 to 7.16, low quality evidence); % weight for height, mean difference -0.82 (95% confidence interval -3.77 to 2.13, low quality evidence); body mass index, mean difference 0.00 (95% confidence interval -0.42 to 0.42, low quality evidence); or in the incidence of ototoxicity, relative risk 0.56 (95% confidence interval 0.04 to 7.96, moderate quality evidence). The percentage change in creatinine significantly favoured once-daily treatment in children, mean difference -8.20 (95% confidence interval -15.32 to -1.08, moderate quality evidence), but showed no difference in adults, mean difference 3.25 (95% confidence interval -1.82 to 8.33, moderate quality evidence). The included trials did not report antibiotic resistance patterns or quality of life.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Once- and three-times daily aminoglycoside antibiotics appear to be equally effective in the treatment of pulmonary exacerbations of cystic fibrosis. There is evidence of less nephrotoxicity in children.
患有囊性纤维化的患者长期被铜绿假单胞菌定植,在治疗肺部急性加重期时通常需要多次静脉注射氨基糖苷类抗生素。氨基糖苷类药物的特性表明,可以减少给药频率并提高剂量。这是对之前发表的综述的更新。
评估静脉注射氨基糖苷类抗生素每日一次给药与每日多次给药治疗囊性纤维化肺部急性加重期的有效性和安全性。
我们检索了Cochrane囊性纤维化和遗传疾病小组编辑基地保存的囊性纤维化专科注册库,其中包括通过全面电子数据库检索、手工检索相关期刊以及手工检索会议论文摘要书籍所确定的参考文献。最近一次检索日期:2016年6月24日。
所有随机对照试验,无论是否发表,只要是在囊性纤维化患者中比较了氨基糖苷类药物每日一次给药与每日多次给药在疗效或毒性或两者方面的差异。
两位作者独立选择纳入综述的研究,并评估每项研究的偏倚风险;作者还使用GRADE标准评估证据质量。数据由每位作者独立提取。与纳入研究的作者联系以获取更多信息。其中一项纳入研究获得了尚未发表的数据。
共识别出15项可能纳入综述的研究。本综述纳入了4项研究,共报告了328名参与者(年龄5至50岁)的结果。所有研究均比较了每日一次给药与每日三次给药。一项研究在所有评估标准方面偏倚风险较低;其余三项纳入研究在盲法方面存在较高偏倚风险,但在其他标准方面被判定偏倚风险不明确或较低。治疗组之间在以下方面无显著差异:一秒用力呼气量,平均差值0.33(95%置信区间-2.81至3.48,中等质量证据);用力肺活量,平均差值0.29(95%置信区间-6.58至7.16,低质量证据);身高体重百分比,平均差值-0.82(95%置信区间-3.77至2.13,低质量证据);体重指数,平均差值0.00(95%置信区间-0.42至0.42,低质量证据);或耳毒性发生率,相对风险0.56(95%置信区间0.04至7.96,中等质量证据)。肌酐的百分比变化在儿童中明显有利于每日一次治疗,平均差值-8.20(95%置信区间-15.32至-1.08,中等质量证据),但在成人中无差异,平均差值3.25(95%置信区间-1.82至8.33,中等质量证据)。纳入的试验未报告抗生素耐药模式或生活质量。
每日一次和每日三次的氨基糖苷类抗生素在治疗囊性纤维化肺部急性加重期似乎同样有效。有证据表明儿童中的肾毒性较小。