Variability in Radiation Dose From Repeat Identical CT Examinations: Longitudinal Analysis of 2851 Patients Undergoing 12,635 Thoracoabdominal CT Scans in an Academic Health System.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to conduct longitudinal analyses of radiation dose data from adult patients undergoing clinically indicated, repeat identical thoracoabdominal CT examinations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Radiation dose data were electronically collected from 2851 subjects undergoing 12,635 repeat identical CT scans (mean number of scans per patient, 4.8; range, 2-33) in one health system. Included CT protocols were chest-abdomen-pelvis with contrast administration (n = 4621 CT studies of 1064 patients), abdomen-pelvis with contrast administration (n = 876 CT studies of 261 patients), renal stone (n = 1053 CT studies of 380 patients), and chest (n = 6085 CT studies of 1146 patients) without contrast administration. A radiation-tracking software infrastructure was adopted to extract data from DICOM headers in PACS. Size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) was calculated.

RESULTS

A trend was observed toward global reduction in SSDE values with all protocols investigated (chest-abdomen-pelvis slope, -1.78; abdomen-pelvis slope, -0.82; renal stone slope, -0.83; chest slope, -0.47; p < 0.001 for all comparisons). The intraindividual analyses of radiation dose distribution showed widespread variability in SSDE values across the four protocols investigated (chest-abdomen-pelvis mean coefficient of variance, 14.02 mGy; abdomen-pelvis mean coefficient of variance, 10.26 mGy; renal stone mean coefficient of variance, 34.18 mGy; chest mean coefficient of variance, 6.74 mGy).

CONCLUSION

Although there is a trend toward global reduction in radiation doses, this study showed widespread variability in the radiation dose that each patient undergoing identical repeat thoracoabdominal CT protocols absorbs. These data may provide a foundation for the future development of best-practice guidelines for patient-specific radiation dose monitoring.