Schmajuk Gabriela, Tonner Chris, Trupin Laura, Li Jing, Sarkar Urmimala, Ludwig Dana, Shiboski Stephen, Sirota Marina, Dudley R Adams, Murray Sara, Yazdany Jinoos
Division of Rheumatology, University of California-San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center - San Francisco Center for Vulnerable Populations & Division of General Internal Medicine at the Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, Department of Medicine, University of California-San Francisco University of California-San Francisco , Enterprise Information and Analytics Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California-San Francisco Institute for Computational Health Sciences, University of California-San Francisco Center for Healthcare Value, Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California-San Francisco Department of Medicine, University of California-San Francisco.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Mar;96(13):e6528. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006528.
Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in the setting of rituximab use is a potentially fatal but preventable safety event. The rate of HBV screening and proportion of patients at risk who receive antiviral prophylaxis in patients initiating rituximab is unknown.We analyzed electronic health record (EHR) data from 2 health systems, a university center and a safety net health system, including diagnosis grouper codes, problem lists, medications, laboratory results, procedures codes, clinical encounter notes, and scanned documents. We identified all patients who received rituximab between 6/1/2012 and 1/1/2016. We calculated the proportion of rituximab users with inadequate screening for HBV according to the Centers for Disease Control guidelines for detecting latent HBV infection before their first rituximab infusion during the study period. We also assessed the proportion of patients with positive hepatitis B screening tests who were prescribed antiviral prophylaxis. Finally, we characterized safety failures and adverse events.We included 926 patients from the university and 132 patients from the safety net health system. Sixty-one percent of patients from the university had adequate screening for HBV compared with 90% from the safety net. Among patients at risk for reactivation based on results of HBV testing, 66% and 92% received antiviral prophylaxis at the university and safety net, respectively.We found wide variations in hepatitis B screening practices among patients receiving rituximab, resulting in unnecessary risks to patients. Interventions should be developed to improve patient safety procedures in this high-risk patient population.
在使用利妥昔单抗的情况下,乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)再激活是一种潜在致命但可预防的安全事件。在开始使用利妥昔单抗的患者中,HBV筛查率以及接受抗病毒预防的高危患者比例尚不清楚。我们分析了来自两个医疗系统(一个大学中心和一个安全网医疗系统)的电子健康记录(EHR)数据,包括诊断分组代码、问题列表、用药情况、实验室检查结果、手术代码、临床会诊记录和扫描文件。我们确定了在2012年6月1日至2016年1月1日期间接受利妥昔单抗治疗的所有患者。根据疾病控制中心关于在首次使用利妥昔单抗输注前检测潜伏性HBV感染的指南,我们计算了在研究期间首次使用利妥昔单抗前对HBV筛查不足的利妥昔单抗使用者的比例。我们还评估了接受抗病毒预防治疗的乙型肝炎筛查呈阳性的患者比例。最后,我们对安全失误和不良事件进行了特征描述。我们纳入了来自大学的926名患者和来自安全网医疗系统的132名患者。大学中有61%的患者对HBV进行了充分筛查,而安全网医疗系统中这一比例为90%。根据HBV检测结果有再激活风险的患者中,大学和安全网分别有66%和92%接受了抗病毒预防治疗。我们发现接受利妥昔单抗治疗的患者在乙型肝炎筛查实践方面存在很大差异,给患者带来了不必要的风险。应制定干预措施,以改善这一高危患者群体的患者安全程序。