Department of Occupational and Public Health Sciences, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Gävle, Kungsbäcksvägen 47, 801 76 Gävle, Sweden.
TNO Leiden, Schipholweg 77, 2316 ZL Leiden, The Netherlands.
Ann Work Expo Health. 2017 Apr 1;61(3):356-368. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxx001.
This study investigated the extent to which controlled changes in work pace in a cyclic pick-and-place task influence upper extremity kinematics and muscle activity, and whether an effect depends on working height.
Thirteen participants performed the task for 4 min at each of five work paces ranging from 8 to 12 cycles·min-1 in each of two experimental conditions where the hand was moved horizontally with an average upper arm elevation of 30° and 50°, respectively. For each work cycle, we calculated the average and standard deviation of the upper arm elevation angle and the activity of the trapezius and deltoid muscles, as well as the angular peak velocity. We summarized these seven variables by calculating averages across cycles and cycle-to-cycle variabilities.
At 30° arm elevation, pace significantly influenced within-cycle angle variation, cycle-to-cycle variability of the average angle, angular peak velocity, and cycle-to-cycle variability of peak velocity. However, only angular peak velocity increased monotonically across all paces from 8 to 12 cycles·min-1). Average activity in the trapezius and the deltoid were the only muscle activity variables to increase consistently with pace. These effects of work pace did not change with working height.
The present study did not find any consistent work pace effect on upper extremity kinematics and muscle activity, in spite of a comprehensive empirical basis compared to previous literature. While our results suggest that work pace may not be of critical concern in an occupational health context, we encourage further studies verifying or disproving this notion.
本研究旨在探讨在循环取放任务中控制工作节奏变化对上肢运动学和肌肉活动的影响程度,以及这种影响是否取决于工作高度。
13 名参与者在两种实验条件下,以 8 至 12 个周期·分钟-1 的五个工作节奏中的每一个进行 4 分钟的任务,其中手在水平方向移动,分别平均上臂抬高 30°和 50°。对于每个工作周期,我们计算上臂抬高角度的平均值和标准差以及斜方肌和三角肌的活动,以及角速度峰值。我们通过计算周期平均值和周期间变异性来总结这七个变量。
在 30°手臂抬高的情况下,工作节奏显著影响了周期内角度变化、平均角度的周期间变异性、角速度峰值和峰值速度的周期间变异性。然而,只有角速度峰值从 8 个周期·分钟-1 单调增加到 12 个周期·分钟-1)。斜方肌和三角肌的平均活动是唯一随工作节奏持续增加的肌肉活动变量。这些工作节奏的影响在工作高度上没有变化。
尽管与以往文献相比,本研究具有全面的实证基础,但我们没有发现工作节奏对上肢运动学和肌肉活动有一致的影响。虽然我们的结果表明,在职业健康背景下,工作节奏可能不是一个关键问题,但我们鼓励进一步的研究来验证或反驳这一观点。