Departamento de Fisioterapia, Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar), São Carlos, SP, Brazil.
Faculdade das Américas (FAM), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Braz J Phys Ther. 2018 Mar-Apr;22(2):110-119. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2017.09.007. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
To evaluate within- and between-days reliability of two normalization methods of surface electromyography (sEMG) recordings of the trapezius muscle.
Nineteen women were allocated into 2 groups (healthy and with neck-shoulder pain). The sEMG was recorded in two sessions with 7 days in between sessions. The four portions of the trapezius muscle (the clavicular and acromial fibers of the upper trapezius, the middle and the lower trapezius) were evaluated during maximal and submaximal isometric voluntary contractions. The within- and between-days reliability of both maximal and submaximal contractions were assessed through Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC was used for within-day analyses of both maximal and submaximal contractions, and for between-days analyses of maximal contractions while ICC was used for between-days analyses of submaximal contractions), Coefficient of Variation, Standard Error of Measurement, and Bland-Altman analysis.
In general, submaximal contractions presented higher within-day reliability, with higher ICC values (e.g., middle trapezius - mean of 0.97), smaller Coefficient of Variation and Standard Error of Measurement ranges compared to maximal contractions (ICC values, e.g. for middle trapezius - mean of 0.94) in both groups. The same pattern was observed for between-days analyses, with submaximal contractions presenting higher ICC values (e.g., middle trapezius - mean of 0.84), smaller Coefficient of Variation and Standard Error of Measurement ranges than maximal contractions (ICC values, e.g. for middle trapezius - mean of 0.73) in both groups.
Submaximal contractions are recommended for normalization procedures of trapezius sEMG, in both subjects with neck-shoulder pain and healthy individuals.
评估斜方肌表面肌电图(sEMG)记录两种归一化方法的日内和日间可靠性。
将 19 名女性分为两组(健康组和颈肩痛组)。在两次会话之间间隔 7 天,记录两次 sEMG。在最大和次最大等长自主收缩期间评估斜方肌的四个部分(上斜方肌的锁骨和肩峰纤维、中斜方肌和下斜方肌)。使用组内相关系数(ICC 用于最大和次最大收缩的日内分析,以及最大收缩的日间分析,而 ICC 用于次最大收缩的日间分析)、变异系数、测量标准误差和 Bland-Altman 分析评估最大和次最大收缩的日内和日间可靠性。
一般来说,次最大收缩的日内可靠性更高,具有更高的 ICC 值(例如,中斜方肌-平均值为 0.97),与最大收缩相比,变异系数和测量标准误差范围更小(例如,中斜方肌-平均值为 0.94)在两组中。日间分析也观察到相同的模式,次最大收缩的 ICC 值更高(例如,中斜方肌-平均值为 0.84),与最大收缩相比,变异系数和测量标准误差范围更小(例如,中斜方肌-平均值为 0.73)在两组中。
对于颈肩痛和健康个体的斜方肌 sEMG 的归一化程序,建议使用次最大收缩。