Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Department of Medicine, Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Hemstead, New York.
JAMA Cardiol. 2017 May 1;2(5):525-534. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.0065.
The Apixaban for Reduction in Stroke and Other Thromboembolic Events in Atrial Fibrillation (ARISTOTLE) trial reported that apixaban therapy was superior to warfarin therapy in preventing stroke and all-cause death while causing significantly fewer major bleeds. To establish the value proposition of substituting apixiban therapy for warfarin therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation, we performed a cost-effectiveness analysis using patient-level data from the ARISTOTLE trial.
To assess the cost and cost-effectiveness of apixaban therapy compared with warfarin therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation from the perspective of the US health care system.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This economic analysis uses patient-level resource use and clinical data collected in the ARISTOTLE trial, a multinational randomized clinical trial that observed 18 201 patients (3417 US patients) for a median of 1.8 years between 2006 and 2011.
Apixaban therapy vs warfarin therapy.
Within-trial resource use and cost were compared between treatments, using externally derived US cost weights. Life expectancies for US patients were estimated according to their baseline risk and treatment using time-based and age-based survival models developed using the overall ARISTOTLE population. Quality-of-life adjustment factors were obtained from external sources. Cost-effectiveness (incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained) was evaluated from a US perspective, and extensive sensitivity analyses were performed.
Of the 3417 US patients enrolled in ARISTOTLE, the mean (SD) age was 71 (10) years; 2329 (68.2%) were male and 3264 (95.5%) were white. After 2 years of anticoagulation therapy, health care costs (excluding the study drug) of patients treated with apixaban therapy and warfarin therapy were not statistically different (difference, -$60; 95% CI, -$2728 to $2608). Life expectancy, modeled from ARISTOTLE outcomes, was significantly longer with apixaban therapy vs warfarin therapy (7.94 vs 7.54 quality-adjusted life years). The incremental cost, including cost of anticoagulant and monitoring, of achieving these benefits was within accepted US norms ($53 925 per quality-adjusted life year, with 98% likelihood of meeting a $100 000 willingness-to-pay threshold). Results were generally consistent when model assumptions were varied, with lifetime cost-effectiveness most affected by the price of apixaban and the time horizon.
Apixaban therapy for ARISTOTLE-eligible patients with atrial fibrillation provides clinical benefits at an incremental cost that represents reasonable value for money judged using US benchmarks for cost-effectiveness.
clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00412984.
重要性:依普利酮减少心房颤动中的中风和其他血栓栓塞事件(ARISTOTLE)试验报告称,阿哌沙班治疗在预防中风和全因死亡方面优于华法林治疗,同时导致大出血明显减少。为了确定用阿哌沙班代替华法林治疗心房颤动患者的价值主张,我们使用来自 ARISTOTLE 试验的患者水平数据进行了成本效益分析。
目的:从美国医疗保健系统的角度评估心房颤动患者中阿哌沙班治疗与华法林治疗的成本和成本效益。
设计、地点和参与者:这项经济分析使用了来自 ARISTOTLE 试验的患者水平资源使用和临床数据,这是一项多中心随机临床试验,观察了 2006 年至 2011 年间 18201 名患者(3417 名美国患者)的中位数为 1.8 年。
干预措施:阿哌沙班治疗与华法林治疗。
主要结果和测量:使用外部衍生的美国成本权重比较了两种治疗方法之间的治疗内资源使用和成本。根据基线风险和使用基于时间和基于年龄的生存模型对美国患者的预期寿命进行估计,该模型是使用总体 ARISTOTLE 人群开发的。从外部来源获得了生活质量调整因素。从美国的角度评估了成本效益(每获得一个质量调整生命年的增量成本),并进行了广泛的敏感性分析。
结果:在 ARISTOTLE 中纳入的 3417 名美国患者中,平均(SD)年龄为 71(10)岁;2329 名(68.2%)为男性,3264 名(95.5%)为白人。接受抗凝治疗 2 年后,接受阿哌沙班治疗和华法林治疗的患者的医疗保健成本(不包括研究药物)无统计学差异(差异,-60 美元;95%CI,-2728 至 2608 美元)。从 ARISTOTLE 结果建模的预期寿命,阿哌沙班治疗显著长于华法林治疗(7.94 比 7.54 个质量调整生命年)。实现这些益处的增量成本,包括抗凝和监测成本,在美国可接受的范围内(每质量调整生命年 53925 美元,达到 10 万美元支付意愿阈值的可能性为 98%)。当模型假设发生变化时,结果基本一致,终生成本效益受阿哌沙班价格和时间范围的影响最大。
结论和相关性:对于符合 ARISTOTLE 标准的心房颤动患者,阿哌沙班治疗提供了临床益处,增量成本代表了合理的性价比,这是使用美国成本效益标准进行判断的。
试验注册:clinicaltrials.gov 标识符:NCT00412984。