Rebuilding Consensus on Valid Criteria for Disordered Grief.
作者信息
Prigerson Holly G, Maciejewski Paul K
机构信息
Cornell Center for Research on End-of-Life Care, New York, New York2Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
出版信息
JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 May 1;74(5):435-436. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.0293.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Rebuilding Consensus on Valid Criteria for Disordered Grief.重建关于复杂性悲伤有效标准的共识。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 May 1;74(5):435-436. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.0293.
2
Clinically Relevant Diagnostic Criteria for a Persistent Impairing Grief Disorder: Putting Patients First.持续性损害性悲伤障碍的临床相关诊断标准：将患者放在首位。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 May 1;74(5):433-434. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.0290.
3
[Attention deficit/hyperactive disorders in children and adolescents as assessed by parents].[父母评估的儿童和青少年注意力缺陷/多动障碍]
Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother. 2009 May;37(3):183-94. doi: 10.1024/1422-4917.37.3.183.
4
[Pathological grief - uncontrollable rage attacks - nocturnal hyperphagia. Is that still normal?].
MMW Fortschr Med. 2014 Mar 20;156(5):18-9.
5
Differential-diagnostic confusion and non-specificity of affective symptoms and anxiety: An empirical study of first-admission patients.情感症状和焦虑的鉴别诊断混乱和非特异性：首次入院患者的实证研究。
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Sep;291:113302. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113302. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
6
Personality dimensions among women with an eating disorder: towards reconceptualizing DSM.患有饮食失调症的女性的人格维度：迈向对《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》的重新概念化
Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2009 Jul;17(4):281-9. doi: 10.1002/erv.938.
7
[The assessment of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) by teacher ratings - validity and reliability of the FBB-HKS].[教师评定法评估注意缺陷多动障碍（ADHD）——FBB-HKS量表的效度与信度]
Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother. 2009 Sep;37(5):431-40. doi: 10.1024/1422-4917.37.5.431.
8
Should prolonged grief be reclassified as a mental disorder in DSM-5?: reconsidering the empirical and conceptual arguments for complicated grief disorder.在《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版（DSM - 5）中，延长哀伤是否应被重新归类为一种精神障碍？：重新审视复杂性哀伤障碍的实证和概念性论据。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2012 Jun;200(6):499-511. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e3182482155.
9
Complicated grief as a stress response disorder: evaluating diagnostic criteria in a German sample.复杂性悲伤作为一种应激反应障碍：在德国样本中评估诊断标准。
J Psychosom Res. 2005 Mar;58(3):235-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2004.09.012.
10
[Clinical and therapeutic aspects of grief].[悲伤的临床与治疗方面]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1989 Aug 25;114(34):1294-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1066757.
引用本文的文献
1
Management model of caregiver's grief in a tertiary oncological center Hospice, from anticipatory mourning to condolence conversation: preliminary observations.三级肿瘤中心临终关怀机构中照顾者悲伤情绪的管理模式：从预期性哀悼到慰问谈话的初步观察
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Dec 20;23(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01620-2.
2
Prolonged grief, post-traumatic stress, and functional impairment in parents and siblings 8 years after the 2011 Utøya terror attack.2011年于特岛恐怖袭击事件八年后，父母及兄弟姐妹所经历的持续性悲伤、创伤后应激障碍及功能损害。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2022 Dec;13(2):2152930. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2022.2152930. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
3
Somatic symptoms and insomnia among bereaved parents and siblings eight years after the Utøya terror attack.创伤后 8 年，乌托亚恐怖袭击事件中遇难者父母和兄弟姐妹的躯体症状和失眠。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2024;15(1):2300585. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2023.2300585. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
4
Exploring the role of empathy in prolonged grief reactions to bereavement.探讨同理心在丧亲后长期悲伤反应中的作用。
Sci Rep. 2023 May 10;13(1):7596. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-34755-y.
5
Trauma Exposure and Prolonged Grief Disorder Among Persons Receiving Community Mental Health Services: Rates and Correlates.接受社区心理健康服务人群中的创伤暴露与持续性悲伤障碍：发生率及相关因素
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Feb 4;12:760837. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.760837. eCollection 2021.
6
Challenges in Obtaining and Assessing Salivary Cortisol and α-Amylase in an Over 60 Population Undergoing Psychotherapeutic Treatment for Complicated Grief: Lessons Learned.60 岁以上人群在接受复杂悲伤心理治疗时获取和评估唾液皮质醇和 α-淀粉酶面临的挑战：经验教训。
Clin Nurs Res. 2021 Jun;30(5):680-689. doi: 10.1177/1054773820973274. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
7
A Systematic Review of Treatment Options for Grieving Older Adults.老年悲伤者治疗方案的系统评价
Curr Treat Options Psychiatry. 2019 Dec;6(4):422-449. doi: 10.1007/s40501-019-00191-x. Epub 2019 Nov 1.
8
Recovering the body in grief: Physical absence and embodied presence.在悲痛中恢复身体：身体的缺席和身体的在场。
Health (London). 2022 Jul;26(4):393-410. doi: 10.1177/1363459320931914. Epub 2020 Jun 7.
9
Transitional objects of grief.悲伤的过渡性客体。
Compr Psychiatry. 2020 Jan 11;98:152161. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2020.152161.
10
Understanding the impact of complicated grief on combat related posttraumatic stress disorder, guilt, suicide, and functional impairment in a clinical trial of post-9/11 service members and veterans.了解复杂悲伤对 9/11 后服务成员和退伍军人创伤后应激障碍、内疚、自杀和功能障碍的临床试验的影响。
Depress Anxiety. 2020 Jan;37(1):63-72. doi: 10.1002/da.22911.
本文引用的文献
1
"Prolonged grief disorder" and "persistent complex bereavement disorder", but not "complicated grief", are one and the same diagnostic entity: an analysis of data from the Yale Bereavement Study.“延长哀伤障碍”与“持续性复杂丧亲障碍”，而非“复杂性哀伤”，是同一诊断实体：来自耶鲁丧亲研究的数据分析
World Psychiatry. 2016 Oct;15(3):266-275. doi: 10.1002/wps.20348.
2
Performance of DSM-5 Persistent Complex Bereavement Disorder Criteria in a Community Sample of Bereaved Military Family Members.DSM-5 持续性复杂丧亲障碍标准在丧亲的军人家庭成员社区样本中的表现。
Am J Psychiatry. 2016 Sep 1;173(9):919-29. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.15111442. Epub 2016 May 24.
3
Complicated grief and related bereavement issues for DSM-5.DSM-5 中的复杂性悲伤及相关丧亲问题。
Depress Anxiety. 2011 Feb;28(2):103-17. doi: 10.1002/da.20780.
4
Prolonged grief disorder: Psychometric validation of criteria proposed for DSM-V and ICD-11.持续性悲伤障碍：针对《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版和《国际疾病分类》第11版所提议标准的心理测量学验证
PLoS Med. 2009 Aug;6(8):e1000121. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000121. Epub 2009 Aug 4.
5
Diagnosis and need for treatment are not the same.诊断和治疗需求并不相同。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1998 Feb;55(2):120. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.55.2.120.
6
Diagnostic criteria for use in psychiatric research.精神科研究中使用的诊断标准。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1972 Jan;26(1):57-63. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1972.01750190059011.
7
Problems of spectrum and bias in evaluating the efficacy of diagnostic tests.评估诊断试验疗效时的谱问题和偏倚问题。
N Engl J Med. 1978 Oct 26;299(17):926-30. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197810262991705.
Zotero 插件