Anderson Rouven, Mueller Ralf, Reese Sven, Wehner Astrid
Clinic of Small Animal Medicine (Anderson, Mueller, Wehner), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany.
Institute of Veterinary Anatomy, Histology and Embryology (Reese), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany.
J Vet Diagn Invest. 2017 May;29(3):278-286. doi: 10.1177/1040638717696442. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
Measurement of total thyroxine (T4) is the first testing step in the work-up of thyroid disease in small animals. We evaluated an enzyme-linked fluorescent assay (ELFA) as an in-house method to measure T4 in cats and dogs. We compared the T4 concentration in sera of 122 cats and 176 dogs measured by the ELFA with an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) to assess the concordance of the 2 methods. Bias of the ELFA in cats was -11.4% and in dogs 1.4%. Using Bland-Altman plots, limits of agreement were -81.5 to 58.7% in cats and -71.4 to 74.4% in dogs. Imprecision was calculated for both methods. Intra- and interassay coefficients of variation (CVs) of the ELFA in feline sera were 0.7 and 3.4% and of the EIA 7.6 and 15.7%, respectively. Intra- and interassay CVs of both ELFA and EIA in canine sera were <9.5%. Reference intervals for the ELFA method were established and were 13.3-49.5 nmol/L for cats and 10.1-42.9 nmol/L for dogs. Accuracy of the EIA and ELFA was scored by assessing if the measured T4 value would identify the expected T4 range (low, normal, or elevated) of patients, based on history, clinical presentation, other diagnostic means, and response to therapy. This was possible for 75 cats and 50 dogs. Both methods yielded acceptable results, but the EIA was more accurate compared to the ELFA (percentage of true-positives in cats and dogs: EIA: 97% and 100%; ELFA: 92% and 94%).
总甲状腺素(T4)测定是小动物甲状腺疾病检查的首要检测步骤。我们评估了一种酶联荧光分析法(ELFA)作为在猫和狗中测量T4的内部方法。我们将通过ELFA测定的122只猫和176只狗血清中的T4浓度与酶免疫分析法(EIA)进行比较,以评估这两种方法的一致性。ELFA在猫中的偏差为-11.4%,在狗中为1.4%。使用布兰德-奥特曼图,猫的一致性界限为-81.5%至58.7%,狗为-71.4%至74.4%。计算了两种方法的不精密度。ELFA在猫血清中的批内和批间变异系数(CVs)分别为0.7%和3.4%,EIA的批内和批间CVs分别为7.6%和15.7%。ELFA和EIA在犬血清中的批内和批间CVs均<9.5%。建立了ELFA方法的参考区间,猫为13.3 - 49.5 nmol/L,狗为10.1 - 42.9 nmol/L。通过根据病史、临床表现、其他诊断方法和治疗反应评估测量的T4值是否能确定患者预期的T4范围(低、正常或升高)来对EIA和ELFA的准确性进行评分。这对75只猫和50只狗是可行的。两种方法都产生了可接受的结果,但与ELFA相比,EIA更准确(猫和狗的真阳性百分比:EIA:97%和100%;ELFA:92%和94%)。