Suppr超能文献

群体智慧在急诊医学中的潜力:汇集医学生的独立决策可提高诊断性能。

The Potential of Collective Intelligence in Emergency Medicine: Pooling Medical Students' Independent Decisions Improves Diagnostic Performance.

作者信息

Kämmer Juliane E, Hautz Wolf E, Herzog Stefan M, Kunina-Habenicht Olga, Kurvers Ralf H J M

机构信息

Center for Adaptive Rationality, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany (JEK, SMH, RHJMK).

AG Progress Test Medizin, Charité Medical School, Berlin, Germany (JEK).

出版信息

Med Decis Making. 2017 Aug;37(6):715-724. doi: 10.1177/0272989X17696998. Epub 2017 Mar 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Evidence suggests that pooling multiple independent diagnoses can improve diagnostic accuracy in well-defined tasks. We investigated whether this is also the case for diagnostics in emergency medicine, an ill-defined task environment where diagnostic errors are rife.

METHODS

A computer simulation study was conducted based on empirical data from 2 published experimental studies. In the computer experiments, 285 medical students independently diagnosed 6 simulated patients arriving at the emergency room with dyspnea. Participants' diagnoses (n = 1,710), confidence ratings, and expertise levels were entered into a computer simulation. Virtual groups of different sizes were randomly created, and 3 collective intelligence rules (follow-the-plurality rule, follow-the-most-confident rule, and follow-the-most-senior rule) were applied to combine the independent decisions into a final diagnosis. For different group sizes, the performance levels (i.e., percentage of correct diagnoses) of the 3 collective intelligence rules were compared with each other and against the average individual accuracy.

RESULTS

For all collective intelligence rules, combining independent decisions substantially increased performance relative to average individual performance. For groups of 4 or fewer, the follow-the-most-confident rule outperformed the other rules; for larger groups, the follow-the-plurality rule performed best. For example, combining 5 independent decisions using the follow-the-plurality rule increased diagnostic accuracy by 22 percentage points. These results were robust across case difficulty and expertise level. Limitations of the study include the use of simulated patients diagnosed by medical students. Whether results generalize to clinical practice is currently unknown.

CONCLUSION

Combining independent decisions may substantially improve the quality of diagnoses in emergency medicine and may thus enhance patient safety.

摘要

背景

有证据表明,在明确界定的任务中汇集多个独立诊断结果可提高诊断准确性。我们调查了在急诊医学中情况是否也是如此,急诊医学是一个诊断错误频发的任务界定不明确的环境。

方法

基于两项已发表的实验研究的实证数据进行了一项计算机模拟研究。在计算机实验中,285名医科学生独立诊断了6名因呼吸困难来到急诊室的模拟患者。将参与者的诊断结果(n = 1710)、信心评级和专业水平输入计算机模拟。随机创建不同规模的虚拟组,并应用3种集体智慧规则(多数决规则、最自信者规则和最资深者规则)将独立决策合并为最终诊断。对于不同的组规模,比较了这3种集体智慧规则的性能水平(即正确诊断的百分比),并与个体平均准确率进行了对比。

结果

对于所有集体智慧规则,相对于个体平均表现,合并独立决策显著提高了性能。对于4人或更少的组,最自信者规则的表现优于其他规则;对于更大的组,多数决规则表现最佳。例如,使用多数决规则合并5个独立决策可将诊断准确率提高22个百分点。这些结果在病例难度和专业水平方面都很稳健。该研究的局限性包括使用医科学生诊断的模拟患者。目前尚不清楚这些结果是否能推广到临床实践。

结论

合并独立决策可能会显著提高急诊医学诊断的质量,从而提高患者安全性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验