• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人机协作:利用交互记忆并勇于发声以提高团队效能。

Human-AI teaming: leveraging transactive memory and speaking up for enhanced team effectiveness.

作者信息

Bienefeld Nadine, Kolbe Michaela, Camen Giovanni, Huser Dominic, Buehler Philipp Karl

机构信息

Work and Organizational Psychology, Department of Management, Technology, and Economics, ETH Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Institute of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 4;14:1208019. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1208019. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1208019
PMID:37599773
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10436524/
Abstract

In this prospective observational study, we investigate the role of transactive memory and speaking up in human-AI teams comprising 180 intensive care (ICU) physicians and nurses working with AI in a simulated clinical environment. Our findings indicate that interactions with AI agents differ significantly from human interactions, as accessing information from AI agents is positively linked to a team's ability to generate novel hypotheses and demonstrate speaking-up behavior, but only in higher-performing teams. Conversely, accessing information from human team members is negatively associated with these aspects, regardless of team performance. This study is a valuable contribution to the expanding field of research on human-AI teams and team science in general, as it emphasizes the necessity of incorporating AI agents as knowledge sources in a team's transactive memory system, as well as highlighting their role as catalysts for speaking up. Practical implications include suggestions for the design of future AI systems and human-AI team training in healthcare and beyond.

摘要

在这项前瞻性观察研究中,我们调查了交互记忆和直言不讳在由180名重症监护(ICU)医生和护士组成的人机协作团队中的作用,这些医护人员在模拟临床环境中与人工智能合作。我们的研究结果表明,与人工智能代理的互动与人际互动显著不同,因为从人工智能代理获取信息与团队产生新假设和展现直言不讳行为的能力呈正相关,但仅在表现较好的团队中如此。相反,从团队成员那里获取信息与这些方面呈负相关,且与团队表现无关。这项研究对人机协作团队以及一般团队科学这一不断扩展的研究领域具有重要贡献,因为它强调了将人工智能代理纳入团队交互记忆系统作为知识来源的必要性,同时突出了它们作为直言不讳催化剂的作用。实际应用包括对未来医疗保健及其他领域人工智能系统设计和人机协作团队培训的建议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ac9/10436524/b853c53e9508/fpsyg-14-1208019-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ac9/10436524/f05a792ec2be/fpsyg-14-1208019-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ac9/10436524/b853c53e9508/fpsyg-14-1208019-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ac9/10436524/f05a792ec2be/fpsyg-14-1208019-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ac9/10436524/b853c53e9508/fpsyg-14-1208019-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Human-AI teaming: leveraging transactive memory and speaking up for enhanced team effectiveness.人机协作:利用交互记忆并勇于发声以提高团队效能。
Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 4;14:1208019. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1208019. eCollection 2023.
2
Human-AI Teaming in Critical Care: A Comparative Analysis of Data Scientists' and Clinicians' Perspectives on AI Augmentation and Automation.重症监护中的人机协作:数据科学家和临床医生对人工智能增强和自动化的观点比较分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jul 22;26:e50130. doi: 10.2196/50130.
3
Influence of transactive memory on perceived performance, job satisfaction and identification in anaesthesia teams.交互记忆对麻醉团队中感知绩效、工作满意度和认同感的影响。
Br J Anaesth. 2008 Mar;100(3):327-32. doi: 10.1093/bja/aem404. Epub 2008 Jan 29.
4
When team member familiarity affects transactive memory and skills: a simulation-based training among police teams.团队成员熟悉程度如何影响交互记忆和技能:警察团队的模拟训练
Ergonomics. 2018 Dec;61(12):1591-1600. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2018.1510547. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
5
Self-beliefs, Transactive Memory Systems, and Collective Identification in Teams: Articulating the Socio-Cognitive Underpinnings of COHUMAIN.团队中的自我信念、交互记忆系统与集体认同:阐明COHUMAIN的社会认知基础
Top Cogn Sci. 2025 Apr;17(2):217-247. doi: 10.1111/tops.12681. Epub 2023 Jul 4.
6
Human factors considerations for the context-aware design of adaptive autonomous teammates.自适应自主队友情境感知设计中的人为因素考量
Ergonomics. 2025 Apr;68(4):571-587. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2024.2380341. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
7
The relationship among intra-group communication, transactive memory systems, collective efficacy and team performance: A structural equation model analysis with Elite Footballers.群体内沟通、交互记忆系统、集体效能与团队绩效的关系:基于精英足球运动员的结构方程模型分析
Eur J Sport Sci. 2023 Apr;23(4):599-606. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2022.2049373. Epub 2022 Mar 20.
8
Leveraging Team Expertise Location Awareness in Improving Team Improvisation: A Dynamic Knowledge Integration Perspective.利用团队专业知识位置感知来改善团队即兴发挥:一种动态知识整合视角
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2021 Dec 19;14:2135-2146. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S341685. eCollection 2021.
9
A moderated mediation model linking transactive memory system and social media with shared leadership and team innovation.中介调节模型将记忆系统和社交媒体与共享领导和团队创新联系起来。
Scand J Psychol. 2021 Aug;62(4):625-637. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12733. Epub 2021 May 14.
10
Moral Decision Making in Human-Agent Teams: Human Control and the Role of Explanations.人类-智能体团队中的道德决策:人类控制与解释的作用
Front Robot AI. 2021 May 27;8:640647. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2021.640647. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of temporary nursing staff on communication patterns: an observation study during daily nurse huddles.临时护理人员对沟通模式的影响:日常护士碰头会期间的一项观察性研究
BMJ Open Qual. 2025 Jun 1;14(2):e003242. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003242.
2
AI Interventions to Alleviate Healthcare Shortages and Enhance Work Conditions in Critical Care: Qualitative Analysis.人工智能干预措施缓解重症监护中的医疗短缺并改善工作条件:定性分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 13;27:e50852. doi: 10.2196/50852.
3
Effects of interacting with a large language model compared with a human coach on the clinical diagnostic process and outcomes among fourth-year medical students: study protocol for a prospective, randomised experiment using patient vignettes.

本文引用的文献

1
Solving the explainable AI conundrum by bridging clinicians' needs and developers' goals.通过弥合临床医生的需求与开发者的目标来解决可解释人工智能难题。
NPJ Digit Med. 2023 May 22;6(1):94. doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00837-4.
2
Foundation models for generalist medical artificial intelligence.通用型医学人工智能的基础模型。
Nature. 2023 Apr;616(7956):259-265. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-05881-4. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
3
Benefits, Limits, and Risks of GPT-4 as an AI Chatbot for Medicine.GPT-4作为医学人工智能聊天机器人的益处、局限性和风险
与大语言模型互动和与人类教练互动对四年级医学生临床诊断过程和结果的影响:一项使用病例简述的前瞻性、随机实验的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 18;14(7):e087469. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087469.
4
Understanding Employee Voice Behavior Through the Use of Digital Voice Channel in Long-Term Care: Protocol for an Embedded Multiple-Case Study.通过在长期护理中使用数字语音渠道理解员工建言行为:一项嵌入式多案例研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Feb 2;13:e48601. doi: 10.2196/48601.
N Engl J Med. 2023 Mar 30;388(13):1233-1239. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr2214184.
4
Evaluating the Feasibility of ChatGPT in Healthcare: An Analysis of Multiple Clinical and Research Scenarios.评估 ChatGPT 在医疗保健中的可行性:对多个临床和研究场景的分析。
J Med Syst. 2023 Mar 4;47(1):33. doi: 10.1007/s10916-023-01925-4.
5
Managing psychological safety in debriefings: a dynamic balancing act.在汇报情况时管理心理安全感:一项动态的平衡行为。
BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2020 Apr 20;6(3):164-171. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2019-000470. eCollection 2020.
6
Human Factors and Technological Characteristics Influencing the Interaction of Medical Professionals With Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Clinical Decision Support Systems: Literature Review.影响医学专业人员与人工智能临床决策支持系统交互的人为因素和技术特征:文献综述
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Mar 24;9(1):e28639. doi: 10.2196/28639.
7
Associations of form and function of speaking up in anaesthesia: a prospective observational study.在麻醉中发声的形式和功能的关联:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Br J Anaesth. 2021 Dec;127(6):971-980. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.08.014. Epub 2021 Sep 10.
8
AI in medicine must be explainable.医学中的人工智能必须是可解释的。
Nat Med. 2021 Aug;27(8):1328. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01461-z.
9
Who is afraid of black box algorithms? On the epistemological and ethical basis of trust in medical AI.谁害怕黑箱算法?论对医学人工智能信任的认识论与伦理基础。
J Med Ethics. 2021 Mar 18. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106820.
10
Interventions promoting employee "speaking-up" within healthcare workplaces: A systematic narrative review of the international literature.促进医疗工作场所员工“直言不讳”的干预措施:国际文献的系统叙述性综述。
Health Policy. 2021 Mar;125(3):375-384. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.12.016. Epub 2021 Jan 21.