Sood Manish M, Akbari Ayub, Manuel Doug, Ruzicka Marcel, Hiremath Swapnil, Zimmerman Deborah, McCormick Brenden, Taljaard Monica
Division of Nephrology.
Insititute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Ottawa, Canada.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017 Jun 7;12(6):904-911. doi: 10.2215/CJN.05640516. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
The association of individual BP components with changes in eGFR in patients with late-stage CKD is unknown. The objectives of our study were to examine the associations of systolic BP, diastolic BP, and pulse pressure with continuous temporal changes in eGFR and an eGFR decline ≥30% in late-stage CKD.
DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We performed a retrospective cohort study (2010-2015) of patients with CKD in a multidisciplinary CKD clinic with an eGFR≤30. The associations of repeat measures of BP (systolic BP, diastolic BP, and pulse pressure) with eGFR were examined using general linear mixed models. The associations of BP components and eGFR decline ≥30% were examined with time-varying Cox models.
In total, 1203 patients were followed for a median of 548 days (interquartile range, 292-913), with an average of 6.7 visits and BP measures per patient. Mean baseline systolic BP, diastolic BP, pulse pressure, and eGFR were 139.2 mmHg, 73.2 mmHg, 64.9 mmHg, and 16.8 ml/min, respectively. Systolic BP and diastolic BP measures over time were statistically significantly associated with changes in eGFR (<0.001), whereas pulse pressure was not. Patients with extremes of systolic BP (<105 or >170) and high diastolic BP (>90) measures were at a higher risk of GFR decline ≥30% (systolic BP <105: hazard ratio, 1.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.98 to 2.34; systolic BP >170: hazard ratio, 1.62; 95% confidence interval, 1.05 to 2.49; referent systolic BP =121-130; diastolic BP =81-90: hazard ratio, 1.40; 95% confidence interval, 0.99 to 1.86; diastolic BP >90: hazard ratio, 1.83; 95% confidence interval, 1.21 to 2.77; referent diastolic BP =61-70). The findings were consistent after multiple sensitivity analyses. Pulse pressure was not significantly associated with risk of eGFR decline.
In patients referred to a multidisciplinary care clinic with late-stage CKD, only extremes of systolic BP and elevations of diastolic BP were associated with eGFR decline.
晚期慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者的个体血压成分与估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR)变化之间的关联尚不清楚。我们研究的目的是探讨收缩压、舒张压和脉压与晚期CKD患者eGFR的连续时间变化以及eGFR下降≥30%之间的关联。
设计、设置、参与者及测量方法:我们在一家多学科CKD诊所对2010 - 2015年eGFR≤30的CKD患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。使用广义线性混合模型检验血压(收缩压、舒张压和脉压)重复测量值与eGFR之间的关联。使用时变Cox模型检验血压成分与eGFR下降≥30%之间的关联。
总共对1203例患者进行了中位时间为548天(四分位间距,292 - 913天)的随访,每位患者平均就诊6.7次并测量血压。平均基线收缩压、舒张压、脉压和eGFR分别为139.2 mmHg、73.2 mmHg、64.9 mmHg和16.8 ml/min。随时间变化的收缩压和舒张压测量值与eGFR变化在统计学上显著相关(<0.001),而脉压则不然。收缩压处于极端值(<105或>170)以及舒张压较高(>90)的患者发生GFR下降≥30%的风险更高(收缩压<105:风险比,1.51;95%置信区间,0.98至2.34;收缩压>170:风险比,1.62;95%置信区间,1.05至2.49;参考收缩压=121 - 130;舒张压=81 - 90:风险比,1.40;95%置信区间,0.99至1.86;舒张压>90:风险比,1.83;95%置信区间,1.21至2.77;参考舒张压=61 - 70)。多次敏感性分析后结果一致。脉压与eGFR下降风险无显著关联。
在转诊至多学科护理诊所的晚期CKD患者中,仅收缩压极端值和舒张压升高与eGFR下降有关。