• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

触摸屏手势类型和方向对手指触摸输入性能及主观评分的影响。

Effects of touchscreen gesture's type and direction on finger-touch input performance and subjective ratings.

作者信息

Jeong Heejin, Liu Yili

机构信息

a Department of Industrial and Operations Engineering , University of Michigan , Ann Arbor , MI , USA.

出版信息

Ergonomics. 2017 Nov;60(11):1528-1539. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2017.1313457. Epub 2017 Apr 8.

DOI:10.1080/00140139.2017.1313457
PMID:28357929
Abstract

This study examined how finger-touch input performance (i.e. task completion time, failure status, and error rate) and subjective ratings (i.e. performance and physical demand) are influenced by touchscreen gestures' type and direction. Twenty participants performed one-touch (i.e. drag and swipe) and two-touch (i.e. pinch and spread) gesture tasks on a tablet, using several major directions (i.e. eight directions for one-touch and four directions for two-touch gestures). The results showed that swipe was approximately 4.5 times faster than drag, but pinch and spread showed no significant difference in task completion time. Dragging and pinching showed more failures or higher error rates compared to swiping and spreading, respectively. One-touch gestures in the horizontal directions were rated to have higher performance and lower physical demand than those in the vertical and diagonal directions. Two-touch gestures in the horizontal directions took the shortest time but caused more failures and higher error rates. Practitioner Summary: This study provides evidence for the effects of touchscreen gestures' type and direction on human performance and subjective ratings, which varied depending on the number of fingers used. Designers should arrange related touchscreen components accordingly, to improve touch-finger input performance and reduce user workload.

摘要

本研究考察了触摸屏手势的类型和方向如何影响手指触摸输入性能(即任务完成时间、失败状态和错误率)以及主观评分(即性能和身体需求)。20名参与者在平板电脑上执行单指触摸(即拖动和滑动)和双指触摸(即捏合和展开)手势任务,使用了几个主要方向(即单指触摸八个方向,双指触摸四个方向)。结果表明,滑动比拖动快约4.5倍,但捏合和展开在任务完成时间上没有显著差异。与滑动和展开相比,拖动和捏合分别显示出更多的失败或更高的错误率。水平方向的单指触摸手势在性能上的评分高于垂直和对角线方向,且身体需求更低。水平方向的双指触摸手势用时最短,但导致更多失败和更高的错误率。从业者总结:本研究为触摸屏手势的类型和方向对人类性能和主观评分的影响提供了证据,这些影响因使用的手指数而异。设计师应相应地安排相关的触摸屏组件,以提高触摸手指输入性能并减轻用户工作量。

相似文献

1
Effects of touchscreen gesture's type and direction on finger-touch input performance and subjective ratings.触摸屏手势类型和方向对手指触摸输入性能及主观评分的影响。
Ergonomics. 2017 Nov;60(11):1528-1539. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2017.1313457. Epub 2017 Apr 8.
2
Index finger and thumb kinematics and performance measurements for common touchscreen gestures.常见触摸屏手势的食指和拇指运动学及性能测量
Appl Ergon. 2017 Jan;58:176-181. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2016.06.004. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
3
Fingertip forces and completion time for index finger and thumb touchscreen gestures.食指和拇指触屏手势的指尖力与完成时间。
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2017 Jun;34:6-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2017.02.007. Epub 2017 Feb 24.
4
Examining the Usability of Touch Screen Gestures for Older and Younger Adults.研究触摸屏手势对老年人和年轻人的可用性。
Hum Factors. 2015 Aug;57(5):835-63. doi: 10.1177/0018720815581293. Epub 2015 May 8.
5
Tablet form factors and swipe gesture designs affect thumb biomechanics and performance during two-handed use.片剂外形因素和滑动手势设计会影响双手使用时拇指的生物力学和性能。
Appl Ergon. 2018 May;69:40-46. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.12.015. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
6
Feel the noise: Mid-air ultrasound haptics as a novel human-vehicle interaction paradigm.感受声音:空中超声触觉作为一种新颖的人车交互范式。
Appl Ergon. 2019 Nov;81:102909. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.102909. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
7
Future technology on the flight deck: assessing the use of touchscreens in vibration environments.飞行甲板上的未来技术:评估在振动环境中使用触摸屏。
Ergonomics. 2019 Feb;62(2):286-304. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2018.1552013. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
8
Age and gestural differences in the ease of rotating a virtual 3D image on a large, multi-touch screen.在大型多点触摸屏幕上旋转虚拟 3D 图像的难易程度与年龄和手势的差异。
Percept Mot Skills. 2013 Apr;116(2):382-405. doi: 10.2466/22.23.PMS.116.2.382-405.
9
An evaluation of touchscreen versus keyboard/mouse interaction for large screen process control displays.针对大屏幕过程控制显示器,对触摸屏与键盘/鼠标交互进行的一项评估。
Appl Ergon. 2017 Oct;64:1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.04.015. Epub 2017 May 8.
10
Effects of touch target location on performance and physical demands of computer touchscreen use.触摸目标位置对计算机触摸屏使用的性能和身体需求的影响。
Appl Ergon. 2017 May;61:159-167. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.01.015. Epub 2017 Feb 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of swiping direction on the interaction performance of elderly-oriented smart home interface: EEG and eye-tracking evidence.滑动方向对面向老年人的智能家居界面交互性能的影响:脑电图和眼动追踪证据。
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 9;14:1089769. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1089769. eCollection 2023.
2
Analysing Touchscreen Gestures: A Study Based on Individuals with Down Syndrome Centred on Design for All.分析触屏手势:一项基于唐氏综合征患者的全纳设计研究
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Feb 13;21(4):1328. doi: 10.3390/s21041328.
3
Tablet form factors and swipe gesture designs affect thumb biomechanics and performance during two-handed use.
片剂外形因素和滑动手势设计会影响双手使用时拇指的生物力学和性能。
Appl Ergon. 2018 May;69:40-46. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.12.015. Epub 2018 Jan 12.