Tsai Joyce, Thase Michael E, Mao Yongcai, Ng-Mak Daisy, Pikalov Andrei, Loebel Antony
1Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc.,Fort Lee,New Jersey,and Marlborough,Massachusetts,USA.
2Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania,Philadelphia,Pennsylvania,USA.
CNS Spectr. 2017 Apr;22(2):236-245. doi: 10.1017/S1092852917000074. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
The aim of this post-hoc analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of lurasidone in treating patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) with mixed features who present with mild and moderate-to-severe levels of anxiety.
The data in this analysis were derived from a study of patients meeting the DSM-IV-TR criteria for unipolar MDD, with a Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score ≥26, presenting with two or three protocol-defined manic symptoms, who were randomized to 6 weeks of double-blind treatment with either lurasidone 20-60 mg/day (n=109) or placebo (n=100). Anxiety severity was evaluated using the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A). To evaluate the effect of baseline anxiety on response to lurasidone, the following two anxiety groups were defined: mild anxiety (HAM-A≤14) and moderate-to-severe anxiety (HAM-A≥15). Change from baseline in MADRS total score was analyzed for each group using a mixed model for repeated measures.
Treatment with lurasidone was associated with a significant week 6 change versus placebo in MADRS total score for patients with both mild anxiety (-18.4 vs. -12.8, p<0.01, effect size [ES]=0.59) and moderate-to-severe anxiety (-22.0 vs. -13.0, p<0.001, ES=0.95). Treatment with lurasidone was associated with a significant week 6 change versus placebo in HAM-A total score for patients with both mild anxiety (-7.6 vs. -4.0, p<0.01, ES=0.62), and moderate-to-severe anxiety (-11.4 vs. -6.1, p<0.0001, ES=0.91).
In this post-hoc analysis of an MDD with mixed features and anxiety population, treatment with lurasidone was associated with significant improvement in both depressive and anxiety symptoms in subgroups with mild and moderate-to-severe levels of anxiety at baseline.
本事后分析旨在评估鲁拉西酮治疗伴有轻度及中度至重度焦虑的混合特征重度抑郁症(MDD)患者的疗效。
本分析中的数据来自一项针对符合单相MDD的DSM-IV-TR标准、蒙哥马利-Åsberg抑郁评定量表(MADRS)总分≥26、出现两种或三种方案定义的躁狂症状的患者的研究,这些患者被随机分为接受为期6周的双盲治疗,分别使用20 - 60 mg/天的鲁拉西酮(n = 109)或安慰剂(n = 100)。使用汉密尔顿焦虑评定量表(HAM-A)评估焦虑严重程度。为评估基线焦虑对鲁拉西酮反应的影响,定义了以下两个焦虑组:轻度焦虑(HAM-A≤14)和中度至重度焦虑(HAM-A≥15)。使用重复测量混合模型分析每组MADRS总分相对于基线的变化。
对于轻度焦虑患者(-18.4 vs. -12.8,p<0.01,效应大小[ES]=0.59)和中度至重度焦虑患者(-22.0 vs. -13.0,p<0.001,ES = 0.95),鲁拉西酮治疗与第6周时MADRS总分相对于安慰剂有显著变化相关。对于轻度焦虑患者(-7.6 vs. -4.0,p<0.01,ES = 0.62)和中度至重度焦虑患者(-11.4 vs. -6.1,p<0.0001,ES = 0.91),鲁拉西酮治疗与第6周时HAM-A总分相对于安慰剂有显著变化相关。
在这项针对具有混合特征和焦虑人群的MDD的事后分析中,鲁拉西酮治疗与基线时轻度及中度至重度焦虑亚组的抑郁和焦虑症状显著改善相关。