Department of Psychology, Stockholm University.
Department of Work, Organizational and Business Psychology, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz.
J Occup Health Psychol. 2018 Apr;23(2):223-236. doi: 10.1037/ocp0000087. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
Theories of psychosocial working conditions assume an interaction of different work environment characteristics. Most studies detail various aspects of such interactions, while fewer investigate the comprehensive patterns of interrelated variables. This exploratory study distinguishes patterns of psychosocial working conditions, describes their characteristics, and investigates their change over 6 years. The working conditions of 1,744 high-skilled workers in Sweden, of a representative sample of the working population, were empirically classified into 4 distinct patterns: (a) the Supporting pattern with a very low workload, very low time pressure, medium learning opportunities, high creativity requirements, and very high autonomy; (b) the Constraining pattern with a very low workload, very low time pressure, low learning opportunities, medium creativity requirements, and very low autonomy; (c) the Demanding pattern with a high workload, high time pressure, medium learning opportunities, high creativity requirements, and very low autonomy; and (d) the Challenging pattern with a high workload, high time pressure, very high learning opportunities, very high creativity requirements, and very high autonomy. Importantly, these patterns were associated with significant differences in worker well-being. From an individual perspective, working conditions most often changed from patterns with a high workload and time pressure to patterns with lower levels of these demands. Over time, the prevalence of the Constraining pattern increased while that of the Challenging pattern decreased. To conclude, a person-centered approach broadens the understanding of the complex interplay between psychosocial working conditions and their longitudinal change, which can improve the tailoring of occupational health interventions. (PsycINFO Database Record
心理社会工作条件理论假设不同工作环境特征之间存在相互作用。大多数研究详细描述了这些相互作用的各个方面,而较少研究相互关联变量的综合模式。这项探索性研究区分了心理社会工作条件模式,描述了它们的特征,并调查了它们在 6 年内的变化。瑞典 1744 名高技能工人的工作条件,是工作人口的代表性样本,被经验分类为 4 种不同的模式:(a)支持模式,工作量极低,时间压力极低,中等学习机会,高创造力要求,非常高的自主权;(b)约束模式,工作量极低,时间压力极低,学习机会低,中等创造力要求,自主权非常低;(c)要求模式,工作量高,时间压力高,中等学习机会,高创造力要求,自主权极低;(d)挑战模式,工作量高,时间压力高,非常高的学习机会,非常高的创造力要求,自主权非常高。重要的是,这些模式与工人的幸福感存在显著差异。从个人角度来看,工作条件通常从高工作量和高时间压力的模式转变为低需求水平的模式。随着时间的推移,约束模式的流行率增加,而挑战模式的流行率下降。总之,以人为中心的方法拓宽了对心理社会工作条件及其纵向变化之间复杂相互作用的理解,这可以提高职业健康干预措施的针对性。