Ševčíková T, Growková K, Kufová Z, Filipová J, Vrublová P, Jelínek T, Kořístek Z, Kryukov F, Kryukova E, Hájek R
Department of Haemato-oncology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
J Clin Pathol. 2017 Oct;70(10):847-853. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2017-204329. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
Some types of monoclonal gammopathies are typified by a very limited availability of aberrant cells. Modern research use high throughput technologies and an integrated approach for detailed characterisation of abnormal cells. This strategy requires relatively high amounts of starting material which cannot be obtained from every diagnosis without causing inconvenience to the patient. The aim of this methodological paper is to reflect our long experience with laboratory work and describe the best protocols for sample collection, sorting and further preprocessing in terms of the available number of cells and intended downstream application in monoclonal gammopathies research. Potential pitfalls are also discussed.
Comparison and optimisation of freezing and sorting protocols for plasma cells in monoclonal gammopathies, followed by testing of various nucleic acid isolation and amplification techniques to establish a guideline for sample processing in haemato-oncology research.
We show the average numbers of aberrant cells that can be obtained from various monoclonal gammopathies (monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance/light chain amyloidosis/multiple myeloma (MM)/MM circulating plasma cells/ minimal residual disease MM-10 123/22 846/305 501/68 641/4000 aberrant plasma cells of 48/30/10/16/37×10 bone marrow mononuclear cells) and the expected yield of nucleic acids provided from multiple isolation kits (DNA/RNA yield from 1 to 200×10 cells was 2.14-427/0.12-123 ng).
Tested kits for parallel isolation deliver outputs comparable with kits specialised for just one type of molecule. We also present our positive experience with the whole genome amplification method, which can serve as a very powerful tool to gain complex information from a very small cell population.
某些类型的单克隆丙种球蛋白病的特点是异常细胞的可获得性非常有限。现代研究使用高通量技术和综合方法对异常细胞进行详细表征。这种策略需要相对大量的起始材料,而从每个诊断中获取这些材料会给患者带来不便。这篇方法学论文的目的是反映我们在实验室工作方面的长期经验,并根据可获得的细胞数量以及单克隆丙种球蛋白病研究中预期的下游应用,描述样本采集、分选和进一步预处理的最佳方案。还讨论了潜在的陷阱。
比较和优化单克隆丙种球蛋白病中浆细胞的冷冻和分选方案,随后测试各种核酸分离和扩增技术,以建立血液肿瘤学研究中样本处理的指南。
我们展示了从各种单克隆丙种球蛋白病(意义未明的单克隆丙种球蛋白病/轻链淀粉样变性/多发性骨髓瘤(MM)/MM循环浆细胞/微小残留病MM - 10 123/22 846/305 501/68 641/4000个异常浆细胞,分别来自48/30/10/16/37×10的骨髓单个核细胞)中可获得的异常细胞的平均数量,以及多种分离试剂盒提供的核酸预期产量(从1到200×10个细胞的DNA/RNA产量为2.14 - 427/0.12 - 123 ng)。
经测试的用于平行分离的试剂盒产生的结果与专门用于一种分子类型的试剂盒相当。我们还介绍了我们在全基因组扩增方法方面的积极经验,该方法可作为一种非常强大的工具,从非常少量的细胞群体中获取复杂信息。