Miller Amanda J, Kiberd Bryce A, Alwayn Ian P, Odutayo Ayo, Tennankore Karthik K
Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, and.
Department of General Surgery, Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada; and.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017 Apr 3;12(4):669-676. doi: 10.2215/CJN.07660716. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
Relatively smaller kidney donor to recipient size is proposed to result in higher graft loss due to nephron underdosing and hyperfiltration injury, but the potentially additive effect of sex and weight mismatch has not been explored in detail. The purpose of this study was to determine if concurrent donor and recipient absolute weight and sex mismatch was associated with graft loss in a cohort of deceased donor kidney transplant recipients.
DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: The association of kidney donor and recipient absolute weight and sex difference with death-censored graft loss was explored using a cohort of United States deceased donor recipients between 2000 and 2014 through the Scientific Registry of Transplants Recipients. Donor-recipient sex pairings (male donor-male recipient; female donor-female recipient; male donor-female recipient; female donor-male recipient) were further stratified by donor and recipient absolute weight difference (>30 or 10-30 kg [donor<recipient; donor>recipient] or <10 kg [donor=recipient]) resulting in 20 weight and sex pairings. Time to death-censored graft loss for each pairing was evaluated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models adjusting for donor, immunologic, surgical, and recipient predictors of graft loss compared with the reference group of male donor-male recipients with no weight mismatch (<10 kg difference).
Of 115,124 kidney transplant recipients, 21,261 developed death-censored graft failure (median graft survival time was 3.8 years; quartile 1 to 3, 0.0 to 14.8 years). After multivariable adjustment, the highest relative hazards for graft failure were observed for female recipients of male donor kidneys and male recipients of female donor kidneys in situations where the recipient was >30 kg larger than donor (hazard ratio, 1.50; 95% confidence interval, 1.32 to 1.70; hazard ratio, 1.35; 95% confidence interval, 1.25 to 1.45, respectively).
A concurrent mismatch in donor-recipient weight (donor<recipient) and donor-recipient sex is associated with a higher risk of death-censored graft loss in kidney transplantation.
相对较小的供肾者与受肾者体型被认为会因肾单位剂量不足和超滤损伤而导致更高的移植肾丢失率,但性别和体重不匹配的潜在叠加效应尚未得到详细探讨。本研究的目的是确定在一组已故供肾者肾移植受者中,供者与受者同时存在的绝对体重和性别不匹配是否与移植肾丢失有关。
设计、背景、参与者与测量:通过移植受者科学注册系统,利用2000年至2014年间美国已故供肾者受者队列,探讨供肾者与受肾者的绝对体重及性别差异与死亡截尾移植肾丢失之间的关联。供者-受者性别配对(男性供者-男性受者;女性供者-女性受者;男性供者-女性受者;女性供者-男性受者)进一步按供者与受者的绝对体重差异分层(>30或10 - 30 kg[供者<受者;供者>受者]或<10 kg[供者 = 受者]),从而产生20种体重和性别配对。使用多变量Cox比例风险模型评估每种配对的死亡截尾移植肾丢失时间,并对移植肾丢失的供者、免疫、手术和受者预测因素进行调整,与体重无差异(差异<10 kg)的男性供者-男性受者参考组进行比较。
在115,124例肾移植受者中,21,261例发生了死亡截尾移植肾失败(移植肾中位存活时间为3.8年;四分位数间距为0.0至14.8年)。经过多变量调整后,在受者比供者体重>30 kg的情况下,男性供肾的女性受者和女性供肾的男性受者的移植肾失败相对风险最高(风险比分别为1.50;95%置信区间为1.32至1.70;风险比为1.35;95%置信区间为1.25至1.45)。
供者-受者体重(供者<受者)和供者-受者性别同时不匹配与肾移植中死亡截尾移植肾丢失的较高风险相关。