Suppr超能文献

拉莫三嗪治疗所有类型双相情感障碍的长期疗效与安全性。

Long-term efficacy and safety of lamotrigine for all types of bipolar disorder.

作者信息

Watanabe Yoshinori, Hongo Seiji

机构信息

Himorogi Psychiatric Institute, Tokyo; Nanko Clinic of Psychiatry, Shirakawa city, Fukushima, Japan.

Nanko Clinic of Psychiatry, Shirakawa city, Fukushima, Japan.

出版信息

Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2017 Mar 20;13:843-854. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S128653. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We investigated whether the long-term efficacy and safety of lamotrigine (LTG) for bipolar disorder (BP) differs between disease types (BP-I, BP-II, or BP not otherwise specified [BP-NOS]), and the efficacy of the concomitant use of antidepressants (ADs).

METHODS

For >1 year, we observed 445 outpatients with BP (diagnosed by DSM-IV criteria) who initiated LTG treatment between July 1 and October 31, 2011, using the Himorogi Self-rating Depression (HSDS) and Anxiety Scales and the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scale and also recorded adverse events.

RESULTS

Treatment efficacy was observed at week 4, with the improved HSDS scores sustained until week 52 for all types of BP; 50% of the patients with any type of BP could be treated with LTG for 1 year, whereas ~40% could be treated for >1.5 years. However, 25% of the patients were withdrawn within the first 4 weeks. The overall incidence of adverse events was 22.9% (104/455): 34.1% (14/41) for BP-I, 22.7% (15/66) for BP-II, and 22.2% (75/338) for BP-NOS. The most common adverse event was skin rash: 22.0% for BP-I, 16.7% for BP-II, and 12.1% for BP-NOS.

LIMITATIONS

There was no control group. Data were collected retrospectively.

CONCLUSION

With careful and adequate titration, long-term treatment with LTG is possible for any type of BP, with BP-NOS patients, the largest population in clinical practice, responding particularly well. Symptoms can improve with or without ADs. Large-scale prospective studies of the efficacy of ADs in bipolar treatment are warranted.

摘要

背景

我们研究了拉莫三嗪(LTG)治疗双相情感障碍(BP)的长期疗效和安全性在不同疾病类型(BP-I、BP-II或未另行指定的BP [BP-NOS])之间是否存在差异,以及联合使用抗抑郁药(ADs)的疗效。

方法

超过1年的时间里,我们观察了445例符合《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)标准诊断为双相情感障碍的门诊患者,这些患者于2011年7月1日至10月31日开始使用LTG治疗,使用日莫罗吉自评抑郁量表(HSDS)、焦虑量表和临床总体印象改善量表,并记录不良事件。

结果

在第4周观察到治疗效果,所有类型的双相情感障碍患者HSDS评分的改善持续到第52周;任何类型双相情感障碍的患者中有50%可以接受LTG治疗1年,而约40%的患者可以接受治疗超过1.5年。然而,25%的患者在最初4周内退出治疗。不良事件的总体发生率为22.9%(104/455):BP-I为34.1%(14/41),BP-II为22.7%(15/66),BP-NOS为22.2%(75/338)。最常见的不良事件是皮疹:BP-I为22.0%,BP-II为16.7%,BP-NOS为12.1%。

局限性

没有对照组。数据是回顾性收集的。

结论

通过仔细且充分的滴定,任何类型的双相情感障碍患者都可以长期使用LTG治疗,BP-NOS患者作为临床实践中最大的群体,反应尤其良好。无论是否使用ADs,症状都可以改善。有必要对ADs在双相情感障碍治疗中的疗效进行大规模前瞻性研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be2b/5365320/7110e8ddc945/ndt-13-843Fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验