Division of Marine Science and Conservation, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Beaufort, North Carolina 28516, USA.
School of Biology, University of St Andrews, Bute Building, St Andrews, Fife KY16 9TS UK.
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 31;7:45765. doi: 10.1038/srep45765.
Diving behaviour of short-finned pilot whales is often described by two states; deep foraging and shallow, non-foraging dives. However, this simple classification system ignores much of the variation that occurs during subsurface periods. We used multi-state hidden Markov models (HMM) to characterize states of diving behaviour and the transitions between states in short-finned pilot whales. We used three parameters (number of buzzes, maximum dive depth and duration) measured in 259 dives by digital acoustic recording tags (DTAGs) deployed on 20 individual whales off Cape Hatteras, North Carolina, USA. The HMM identified a four-state model as the best descriptor of diving behaviour. The state-dependent distributions for the diving parameters showed variation between states, indicative of different diving behaviours. Transition probabilities were considerably higher for state persistence than state switching, indicating that dive types occurred in bouts. Our results indicate that subsurface behaviour in short-finned pilot whales is more complex than a simple dichotomy of deep and shallow diving states, and labelling all subsurface behaviour as deep dives or shallow dives discounts a significant amount of important variation. We discuss potential drivers of these patterns, including variation in foraging success, prey availability and selection, bathymetry, physiological constraints and socially mediated behaviour.
深觅食潜水和浅非觅食潜水。然而,这种简单的分类系统忽略了在水下期间发生的大部分变化。我们使用多状态隐马尔可夫模型(HMM)来描述短鳍领航鲸的潜水行为状态和状态之间的转换。我们使用了在北卡罗来纳州哈特拉斯角附近部署的 20 只个体鲸鱼上的数字声学记录标签(DTAG)测量的三个参数(嗡嗡声次数、最大潜水深度和持续时间)来进行分析。HMM 确定了一个四状态模型作为潜水行为的最佳描述符。潜水参数的状态相关分布显示了状态之间的变化,表明了不同的潜水行为。与状态切换相比,状态持续的转移概率要高得多,这表明潜水类型以爆发的形式出现。我们的结果表明,短鳍领航鲸的水下行为比简单的深潜水和浅潜水状态二分法更为复杂,将所有水下行为标记为深潜水或浅潜水会忽略大量重要的变化。我们讨论了这些模式的潜在驱动因素,包括觅食成功率、猎物可利用性和选择性、水深、生理限制和社会介导的行为的变化。