Sethi Rajiv, Buchlak Quinlan D, Yanamadala Vijay, Anderson Melissa L, Baldwin Eric A, Mecklenburg Robert S, Leveque Jean-Christophe, Edwards Alicia M, Shea Mary, Ross Lisa, Wernli Karen J
Neuroscience Institute, Virginia Mason Medical Center.
Group Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.
J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Jun;26(6):744-750. doi: 10.3171/2016.11.SPINE16537. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
OBJECTIVE Systematic multidisciplinary approaches to improving quality and safety in complex surgical care have shown promise. Complication rates from complex spine surgery range from 10% to 90% for all surgeries, and the overall mortality rate is 1%-4%. These rates suggest the need for improved perioperative complex spine surgery processes designed to minimize risk and improve quality. METHODS The Group Health Research Institute and Virginia Mason Medical Center implemented a systematic multidisciplinary protocol, the Seattle Spine Team Protocol, in 2010. This protocol involves the following elements: 1) a comprehensive multidisciplinary conference including clinicians from neurosurgery, anesthesia, orthopedics, internal medicine, behavioral health, and nursing, collaboratively deciding on each patient's suitability for surgery; 2) a mandatory patient education course that reviews the risks of surgery, preparation for the surgery, and postoperative care; 3) a dual-attending-surgeon approach involving 1 neurosurgeon and 1 orthopedic spine surgeon; 4) a dedicated specialist complex spine anesthesia team; and 5) rigorous intraoperative monitoring of a patient's blood loss and coagulopathy. The authors identified 71 patients who underwent complex spine surgery involving fusion of 6 or more levels before implementation of the protocol (surgery between 2008 and 2010) and 69 patients who underwent complex spine surgery after the implementation of the protocol (2010 and 2012). All patient demographic variables, including age, sex, body mass index, smoking status, diagnosis of diabetes and/or osteoporosis, previous surgery, and the nature of the spinal deformity, were comprehensively assessed. Also comprehensively assessed were surgical variables, including operative time, number of levels fused, and length of stay. The authors assessed overall complication rates at 30 days and 1 year and detailed deaths, cardiovascular events, infections, instrumentation failures, and CSF leaks. Chi-square and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to assess differences in patient characteristics for patients with a procedure in the preimplementation period from those in the postimplementation period under a Poisson distribution model. RESULTS Patients who underwent surgery after implementation of the Seattle Spine Team Protocol had a statistically significant reduction (relative risk 0.49 [95% CI 0.30-0.78]) in all measured complications, including cardiovascular events, wound infections, other perioperative infections, and implant failures within 30 days after surgery; the analysis was adjusted for age and Charlson comorbidity score. A trend toward fewer deaths in this group was also found. CONCLUSIONS This type of systematic quality improvement strategy can improve quality and patient safety and might be applicable to other complex surgical disciplines. Implementation of these strategies in the treatment of adult spinal deformity will likely lead to better patient outcomes.
目的 系统的多学科方法在改善复杂外科手术护理的质量和安全性方面已显示出前景。所有复杂脊柱手术的并发症发生率在10%至90%之间,总体死亡率为1% - 4%。这些比率表明需要改进围手术期复杂脊柱手术流程,以尽量降低风险并提高质量。方法 2010年,健康集团研究所和弗吉尼亚梅森医疗中心实施了一项系统的多学科方案,即西雅图脊柱团队方案。该方案包括以下要素:1)一次全面的多学科会议,参会人员包括神经外科、麻醉科、骨科、内科、行为健康科和护理科的临床医生,共同决定每位患者是否适合手术;2)一门强制性的患者教育课程,内容包括手术风险、手术准备和术后护理;3)双主刀医生模式,包括1名神经外科医生和1名骨科脊柱外科医生;4)一个专门的复杂脊柱麻醉专家团队;5)对患者失血情况和凝血功能障碍进行严格的术中监测。作者确定了71例在该方案实施前(2008年至2010年)接受涉及6个或更多节段融合的复杂脊柱手术的患者,以及69例在该方案实施后(2010年至2012年)接受复杂脊柱手术的患者。全面评估了所有患者的人口统计学变量,包括年龄、性别、体重指数、吸烟状况、糖尿病和/或骨质疏松症诊断、既往手术史以及脊柱畸形的性质。还全面评估了手术变量,包括手术时间、融合节段数和住院时间。作者评估了30天和1年时的总体并发症发生率以及详细的死亡情况、心血管事件、感染、器械故障和脑脊液漏。采用卡方检验和威尔科克森秩和检验,在泊松分布模型下评估实施前阶段手术患者与实施后阶段手术患者的特征差异。结果 在实施西雅图脊柱团队方案后接受手术的患者,在所有测量的并发症方面,包括心血管事件、伤口感染、其他围手术期感染以及术后30天内的植入物故障,均有统计学显著降低(相对风险0.49 [95%置信区间0.30 - 0.78]);分析对年龄和查尔森合并症评分进行了调整。在这组患者中还发现了死亡人数减少的趋势。结论 这种系统的质量改进策略可以提高质量和患者安全性,可能适用于其他复杂外科领域。在成人脊柱畸形治疗中实施这些策略可能会带来更好的患者预后。