Suppr超能文献

脊柱外科基于机构的质量与安全改进举措:一项范围综述

Institution-Based Quality and Safety Improvement Initiatives in Spine Surgery: A Scoping Review.

作者信息

He Zonglin, An Meiru, Chen Dong, Peng Huili, Tao Huiren, Cheung Kenneth M C

机构信息

Orthopaedic Centre, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Futian District, Shenzhen, China.

Department of Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, China.

出版信息

JBJS Rev. 2025 May 27;13(5). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.24.00195. eCollection 2025 May 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Improving patient safety and healthcare quality is necessary to advance value-based health care. Spine surgery is complex, entailing joint efforts between different disciplines. This scoping review aimed to map the research on establishing and implementing institution-based quality improvement (QI) initiatives in spine surgery.

METHODS

Studies were identified in electronic searches of PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases. Qualitative or quantitative studies that report the implementation of QI programs that occurred in or covered spine surgery were included; studies that did not describe the establishment, implementations, impacts, barriers, and facilitators of QI initiatives were excluded. Three reviewers independently screened the retrieved studies, and 2 reviewers extracted data and conducted a quality assessment of full-text articles. Studies were categorized according to dimensions of quality (timely, effective, patient-centered, efficient, equitable, and safe), and quality appraisal was conducted using the Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence reporting guidelines.

RESULTS

The search from the 3 databases yielded 2,876 returns; after removing duplicates, there were 1,274 in total. After screening, 228 records were entered into a full-text review, resulting in 133 records included in the review. Specifically, 88 addressed aspects of efficiency, 74 on safety, 32 on improving effectiveness, 23 on patient-centeredness, 7 on timeliness, and 1 on equity. Of the studies included, 71 rely on retrospective audits, 19 are prospective, and only 8 are interventional trials. Only 67 QI initiatives leveraged the advantages of multidisciplinary teams or the rigor of evidence-based protocols. Study gaps include limited follow-up, small sample sizes, and lack of comprehensive assessment using both objective measures and patient-reported outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

This scoping review maps the current research on developing and implementing institution-based QI initiatives in spine surgery. Although most of the initiatives reported show improvement in the quality of health care and patient safety from multiple aspects, the sustainability of these initiatives remains unknown, and further studies are needed to trace the long-term effects and generalizability of these initiatives.

摘要

背景

提高患者安全性和医疗质量对于推进基于价值的医疗保健至关重要。脊柱手术复杂,需要不同学科之间的共同努力。本范围综述旨在梳理关于在脊柱手术中建立和实施基于机构的质量改进(QI)举措的研究。

方法

通过对PubMed、科学网和Scopus数据库进行电子检索来确定研究。纳入报告在脊柱手术中发生或涵盖脊柱手术的QI项目实施情况的定性或定量研究;排除未描述QI举措的建立、实施、影响、障碍和促进因素的研究。三位评审员独立筛选检索到的研究,两位评审员提取数据并对全文进行质量评估。研究根据质量维度(及时、有效、以患者为中心、高效、公平和安全)进行分类,并使用《卓越质量改进报告标准》报告指南进行质量评估。

结果

从这三个数据库检索到2876条结果;去除重复项后,共有1274条。筛选后,228条记录进入全文评审,最终133条记录纳入综述。具体而言,88条涉及效率方面,74条涉及安全,32条涉及提高有效性,23条涉及以患者为中心,7条涉及及时性,1条涉及公平性。在纳入的研究中,71项依赖回顾性审计,19项是前瞻性的,只有8项是干预性试验。只有67项QI举措利用了多学科团队的优势或循证方案的严谨性。研究空白包括随访有限、样本量小以及缺乏使用客观指标和患者报告结局的综合评估。

结论

本范围综述梳理了目前关于在脊柱手术中开展和实施基于机构的QI举措的研究。尽管报告的大多数举措在多个方面显示出医疗保健质量和患者安全有所改善,但这些举措的可持续性仍不清楚,需要进一步研究来追踪这些举措的长期效果和普遍性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09bd/12101897/0bbfcdb4ad8e/jbjsrev-13-e24.00195-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验