Huenink Ellen, Porterfield Susan
Saint Joseph's Children's Hospital, Tampa, Florida (Dr Huenink); and Florida State University, Tallahassee (Dr Porterfield).
Adv Neonatal Care. 2017 Apr;17(2):E10-E18. doi: 10.1097/ANC.0000000000000359.
Many neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) parents experience emotional distress leading to adverse infant outcomes. Parents may not cope positively in stressful situations, and support programs often are underutilized.
To determine coping mechanisms utilized by NICU parents, and types of support programs parents are likely to attend. To determine whether sociodemographic and length-of-stay differences impact coping mechanisms utilized, and types of support programs preferred.
A correlational cross-sectional survey design was used. The 28-item Brief COPE tool, questions about demographics and preferred support program styles, was distributed to a convenience sample of NICU parents in a level IV NICU in the southeastern United States.
One hundred one NICU parents used coping mechanisms, with acceptance emotional support, active coping, positive reframing, religion, planning, and instrumental support being the most common. Preferred support classes were infant development and talking with other NICU parents. Caucasians more commonly coped using active coping, planning, emotional support, acceptance, instrumental support, and venting compared with other races. Women utilized self-blame coping mechanisms more often compared with men. Younger parents were more likely to use venting and denial coping mechanisms. Parents with a shorter stay utilized self-distraction coping and preferred the class of talking with other parents.
Support program preference, type of coping mechanism utilized, and sociodemographic factors may be used to guide the creation of NICU support programs.
Additional studies are needed to determine whether support program offering according to preferences and sociodemographic characteristics increases attendance and decreases emotional distress.
许多新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)患儿的家长经历情绪困扰,这会导致不良的婴儿结局。家长在压力情境下可能无法积极应对,而且支持项目的利用率往往较低。
确定NICU患儿家长所采用的应对机制,以及家长可能参加的支持项目类型。确定社会人口统计学和住院时间差异是否会影响所采用的应对机制以及偏好的支持项目类型。
采用相关性横断面调查设计。向美国东南部一家四级NICU的NICU患儿家长便利样本发放了包含28个条目的简易应对方式问卷(Brief COPE)工具、有关人口统计学和偏好的支持项目风格的问题。
101位NICU患儿家长采用了应对机制,其中接受情感支持、积极应对、积极重新评价、宗教、计划和工具性支持最为常见。偏好的支持课程是婴儿发育以及与其他NICU患儿家长交流。与其他种族相比,白人更常采用积极应对、计划、情感支持、接受、工具性支持和宣泄等方式。与男性相比,女性更常采用自责的应对机制。年轻家长更有可能采用宣泄和否认的应对机制。住院时间较短的家长采用自我分心应对方式,并且更喜欢与其他家长交流的课程。
支持项目偏好、所采用的应对机制类型以及社会人口统计学因素可用于指导NICU支持项目的创建。
需要进一步研究以确定根据偏好和社会人口统计学特征提供支持项目是否会提高参与率并减轻情绪困扰。