Suppr超能文献

内镜切除所致食管穿孔的内镜组织屏蔽术

Endoscopic tissue shielding for esophageal perforation caused by endoscopic resection.

作者信息

Takahashi Ryo, Yoshio Toshiyuki, Horiuchi Yusuke, Omae Masami, Ishiyama Akiyoshi, Hirasawa Toshiaki, Yamamoto Yorimasa, Tsuchida Tomohiro, Fujisaki Junko

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31, Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.

出版信息

Clin J Gastroenterol. 2017 Jun;10(3):214-219. doi: 10.1007/s12328-017-0738-z. Epub 2017 Mar 31.

Abstract

In Japan, endoscopic resection (ER), including endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection, is widely performed for superficial esophageal neoplasms and accepted as a minimally invasive treatment. Perforation is a major complication of ER, with an incidence rate of 1-5%. While conservative treatment has become a more common choice, surgical treatment of perforations is sometimes required, especially for large perforations. Of 1408 cases of esophageal ER that have been performed, 17 cases of perforation occurred at the Cancer Institute Hospital between 2005 and 2016. Most cases were treated with endoscopic clipping and managed conservatively; however, 2 cases were not eligible for endoscopic closure. We report two cases of large perforations of 15 and 20 mm, respectively. Both cases were treated conservatively with endoscopic tissue shielding, in which the perforations were covered with a large polyglycolic acid (PGA) sheet that was affixed with fibrin glue. Neither of the cases required open surgery. In both cases, feeding started three weeks after the procedure (19 and 21 days), and both were discharged within a month (29 and 30 days). In conclusion, tissue shielding with PGA sheets in large perforations after esophageal ER is a good choice to safely proceed with conservative treatment. On the other hand, endoscopic clipping is effective and reasonable for small perforations.

摘要

在日本,内镜下切除术(ER),包括内镜黏膜切除术和内镜黏膜下剥离术,被广泛应用于浅表性食管肿瘤的治疗,并被视为一种微创治疗方法。穿孔是ER的主要并发症,发生率为1%至5%。虽然保守治疗已成为更常见的选择,但有时仍需要对穿孔进行手术治疗,尤其是对于较大的穿孔。在癌症研究所医院2005年至2016年间进行的1408例食管ER病例中,有17例发生了穿孔。大多数病例采用内镜夹闭并进行保守治疗;然而,有2例不符合内镜闭合的条件。我们报告了两例分别为15毫米和20毫米的大穿孔病例。两例均采用内镜组织覆盖保守治疗,即用纤维蛋白胶固定的大聚乙醇酸(PGA)片覆盖穿孔。两例均无需进行开放手术。两例在术后三周(19天和21天)开始进食,均在一个月内(29天和30天)出院。总之,食管ER术后大穿孔采用PGA片进行组织覆盖是安全进行保守治疗的良好选择。另一方面,内镜夹闭对于小穿孔有效且合理。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验