Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Information and Computer Technology, Faculty of Engineering, Tokyo University of Science, Tokyo, Japan.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Dec;92(6):1176-1186.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.04.070. Epub 2020 May 4.
Postoperative stricture after expansive esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a severe adverse event. Previous single-arm reports have suggested that polyglycolic acid (PGA) shielding may prevent stricture. This study was performed to assess the efficacy of this method through a comparative analysis.
This is a retrospective analysis of 500 consecutive cases of esophageal ESD performed between 2002 and 2018 at the University of Tokyo Hospital. After 2013, patients with a diagnosis of superficial esophageal carcinoma covering more than half of the esophageal circumference underwent preventive treatment with either PGA shielding or steroid injection + PGA shielding after ESD. The efficacy of these methods for preventing post-ESD stricture was assessed through multivariable logistic regression analysis.
The risk of postoperative stricture was especially high in the cervical esophagus (odds ratio [OR], 4.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65-61.09) and after total circumferential resection (OR, 3.58×10; lower bound of 95% CI, >185). Steroid injection + PGA shielding was the only method significantly effective in preventing stricture (OR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.10-0.78; P = .009). In the relatively low-risk subgroup (excluding cervical esophageal cancer and complete circumferential resection), the postoperative stricture rates for steroid injection + PGA shielding versus PGA shielding versus control were 18.9% versus 41.4% versus 51.7%, respectively (P = .015). However, the efficacy of this was limited in extremely high-risk cases.
The combination of steroid injection and PGA shielding is effective for preventing post-ESD stricture. There is a need for even more effective methods for cervical esophageal cancer and complete circumferential resection.
食管内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)后发生的狭窄是一种严重的不良事件。之前的单臂研究报告表明,聚乙醇酸(PGA)覆盖物可能预防狭窄。本研究通过对比分析来评估这种方法的疗效。
这是一项对 2002 年至 2018 年期间在东京大学医院进行的 500 例连续食管 ESD 病例的回顾性分析。2013 年后,对于诊断为覆盖食管周长一半以上的表浅食管癌患者,在 ESD 后行 PGA 覆盖物或类固醇注射+PGA 覆盖物预防治疗。通过多变量逻辑回归分析评估这些方法预防 ESD 后狭窄的疗效。
颈段食管(比值比[OR],4.60;95%置信区间[CI],0.65-61.09)和全周缘切除(OR,3.58×10;95%CI 下限,>185)后发生术后狭窄的风险特别高。类固醇注射+PGA 覆盖物是唯一一种能显著预防狭窄的方法(OR,0.30;95%CI,0.10-0.78;P=0.009)。在风险相对较低的亚组(不包括颈段食管癌和全周缘切除)中,类固醇注射+PGA 覆盖物组、PGA 覆盖物组和对照组的术后狭窄发生率分别为 18.9%、41.4%和 51.7%(P=0.015)。然而,该方法的疗效在极高风险病例中受到限制。
类固醇注射联合 PGA 覆盖物预防 ESD 后狭窄有效。对于颈段食管癌和全周缘切除,需要更有效的方法。