Suppr超能文献

经皮内镜下颈椎间盘切除术(PECD):疗效分析及再次手术原因

Percutaneous Endoscopic Cervical Discectomy (PECD): An Analysis of Outcome, Causes of Reoperation.

作者信息

Oh Hyeong Seok, Hwang Byeong-Wook, Park Sang-Joon, Hsieh Chang-Sheng, Lee Sang-Ho

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Spine Health Wooridul Hospital, Busan, Korea.

Department of Neurosurgery, Spine Health Wooridul Hospital, Busan, Korea.

出版信息

World Neurosurg. 2017 Jun;102:583-592. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.03.056. Epub 2017 Mar 29.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy (PECD) is regarded as an effective treatment modality in cervical disc herniation, including radicular pain and lateral location of disc herniation. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and radiologic outcomes of PECD along with the causes of reoperation and the technique itself.

METHODS

Between January 2007 and November 2012, 101 patients underwent PECD at the Busan Wooridul Hospital. Three patients underwent a 2-level PECD. The mean follow-up period was 34 months (range, 18-72 months). The mean age was 46.1 years; the most common operation was at the C5-C6 level (n = 45), followed by C6-C7 (n = 35), C4-C5 (n = 16), and C3-C4 (n = 8). The clinical outcomes were evaluated via the visual analog scale of the neck and arm according to the Neck Disability Index and the modified Macnab criteria. Among 101 patients, 12 underwent an additional operation at the index level. Five patients had aggravated stenosis by disc height narrowing, 4 had recurred disc, 2 had remained disc, and 1 had sustained symptoms.

RESULTS

After PECD, there was a significant improvement in the visual analog scale and Neck Disability Index scores (P < 0.001). According to the modified Macnab criteria, excellent concordance was achieved in 65 patients, good in 22, fair in 2, and poor in 12. The reoperation performed on 12 patients improved their clinical outcomes. The mean duration was 4.8 months (2 days to 18 months) until reoperation. There were 3 PECD revisions, 3 artificial disc replacements, 2 corpectomies, 2 anterior cervical discectomies and fusion with cages, and 2 transfers to another hospital. The common feature was older age (P = 0.016) and male sex (P = 0.031). Preoperative radiologic findings were characterized by the foraminal disc (P = 0.04), disc degeneration at the index level (P = 0.05), combined bony spur (P = 0.001), concomitant adjacent level degeneration (P = 0.019), cervical kyphosis (P = 0.015), and segmental angle deterioration after PECD (P = 0.038). No statistical correlation was seen between the operation level and herniation size (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In total, 87% patients showed successful clinical outcome. Poor and fair outcomes at initial PECD were overcome by revision surgery, which improved outcomes. Although PECD is a promising minimally invasive procedure for cervical disc treatment, the indications for PECD should be considered carefully.

摘要

目的

经皮内镜下颈椎间盘切除术(PECD)被视为治疗颈椎间盘突出症(包括神经根性疼痛和椎间盘突出的外侧位置)的有效治疗方式。本研究旨在评估PECD的临床和影像学结果,以及再次手术的原因和该技术本身。

方法

2007年1月至2012年11月期间,101例患者在釜山Wooridul医院接受了PECD。3例患者接受了双节段PECD。平均随访期为34个月(范围18 - 72个月)。平均年龄为46.1岁;最常见的手术节段是C5 - C6(n = 45),其次是C6 - C7(n = 35)、C4 - C5(n = 16)和C3 - C4(n = 8)。根据颈部功能障碍指数和改良Macnab标准,通过颈部和手臂的视觉模拟量表评估临床结果。101例患者中,12例在索引节段接受了再次手术。5例因椎间盘高度变窄导致狭窄加重,4例椎间盘复发,2例椎间盘残留,1例症状持续。

结果

PECD后,视觉模拟量表和颈部功能障碍指数评分有显著改善(P < 0.001)。根据改良Macnab标准,65例患者疗效极佳,22例良好,2例一般,12例差。对12例患者进行的再次手术改善了他们的临床结果。再次手术的平均时间为4.8个月(2天至18个月)。有3例PECD翻修术,3例人工椎间盘置换术,2例椎体次全切除术,2例颈椎前路椎间盘切除并椎间融合术,以及2例转至其他医院。共同特征是年龄较大(P = 0.016)和男性(P = 0.031)。术前影像学表现的特征为椎间孔型椎间盘(P = 0.04)、索引节段椎间盘退变(P = 0.05)、合并骨赘(P = 0.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验