Liao Conggang, Ren Qiang, Chu Lei, Shi Lei, Yu Qingshuai, Yan Zhenjian, Yu Kexiao, Liu Chao, Wu Wenkai, Xiong Yang, Deng Zhongliang, Chen Liang
Department of Orthopedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No. 76 Linjiang Road, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, 400010, China.
Eur Spine J. 2018 Jun;27(6):1460-1468. doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5527-y. Epub 2018 Feb 24.
During the long-term practice of percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy (PECD) at our institution, we have modified the protocol to include the vertical anchoring technique (VAT), which we will describe in detail in this article. The objective of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes associated with the conventional posterior PECD technique with that associated with the modified technique to determine the safety and efficacy of the latter technique.
From December 2014 to January 2016, a total of 44 patients with single cervical disc herniation were randomly divided into two groups. One group underwent conventional posterior PECD, and the other group underwent posterior PECD combined with VAT. The operative time, fluoroscopy times and perioperative complications were recorded. The visual analog scale (VAS) for neck and arm pain and the modified MacNab criteria at 1 day, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery were used to evaluate the postoperative outcomes.
All patients underwent surgery successfully without severe complications. The operative time and intraoperative fluoroscopy times were significantly less in patients treated with VAT than in those who underwent conventional posterior PECD (P < 0.05). Both types of surgery significantly improved the symptoms of patients. According to the results of the follow-up period, there were no significant differences in VAS scores for neck and arm pain or the modified MacNab criteria between the two groups (P > 0.05). There was no recurrence in either group during the follow-up period.
Although the clinical outcomes of the two surgical techniques were similar, the VAT decreased the operative time and intraoperative fluoroscopy times in posterior PECD surgery. The learning curve for posterior PECD could be shortened by using the VAT. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
在我们机构进行经皮内镜下颈椎间盘切除术(PECD)的长期实践过程中,我们对手术方案进行了改进,纳入了垂直锚定技术(VAT),本文将对此进行详细描述。本研究的目的是比较传统后路PECD技术与改良技术的临床疗效,以确定后者的安全性和有效性。
2014年12月至2016年1月,共44例单节段颈椎间盘突出症患者被随机分为两组。一组接受传统后路PECD手术,另一组接受后路PECD联合VAT手术。记录手术时间、透视次数和围手术期并发症。采用术后1天、3个月、6个月和12个月时的颈部和手臂疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)以及改良MacNab标准评估术后疗效。
所有患者均成功接受手术,无严重并发症。采用VAT治疗的患者手术时间和术中透视次数明显少于接受传统后路PECD手术的患者(P<0.05)。两种手术方式均显著改善了患者症状。根据随访结果,两组患者颈部和手臂疼痛的VAS评分或改良MacNab标准之间无显著差异(P>0.05)。随访期间两组均无复发。
虽然两种手术技术的临床疗效相似,但VAT减少了后路PECD手术的手术时间和术中透视次数。使用VAT可缩短后路PECD的学习曲线。这些幻灯片可在电子补充材料中获取。