Suppr超能文献

自体造血干细胞移植受者的氟喹诺酮预防性用药

Fluoroquinolone prophylaxis in autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients.

作者信息

Modi Dipenkumar, Jang Hyejeong, Kim Seongho, Surapaneni Malini, Sankar Kamya, Deol Abhinav, Ayash Lois, Bhutani Divaya, Lum Lawrence G, Ratanatharathorn Voravit, Manasa Richard, Mellert Kendra, Chandrasekar Pranatharthi, Uberti Joseph P

机构信息

Department of Hematology-Oncology, Karmanos Cancer Institute/Wayne State University, 4100 John R, HW04H0, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA.

Biostatistics Core, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA.

出版信息

Support Care Cancer. 2017 Aug;25(8):2593-2601. doi: 10.1007/s00520-017-3670-3. Epub 2017 Apr 2.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Although fluoroquinolone prophylaxis is frequently utilized in autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (AHSCT) patients, its impact on morbidity and mortality is uncertain. This study investigates the role of quinolone prophylaxis after AHSCT in recent years.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of 291 consecutive adult patients who underwent AHSCT for malignant disorders, between June 2013 and January 2015. Outcomes were compared between patients who received norfloxacin prophylaxis and those who did not. The endpoints were mortality during prophylaxis and at 100 days after transplant, frequency of ICU admissions, and incidence and type of bacteremia.

RESULTS

Of 291 patients, 252 patients received norfloxacin prophylaxis and 39 patients did not. The mortality during prophylaxis and at 100 days as well as the median number of days of hospitalization following AHSCT did not differ between the two groups. No differences were noted in the frequency of ICU admission, incidence of septic shock, and duration of ICU stay. Patients who did not receive prophylaxis had a significantly higher rate of neutropenic fever (97%) than patients who received prophylaxis (77%) (p = 0.005). The patients with prophylaxis demonstrated a significantly higher rate of gram-positive bacteremia as compared to those without prophylaxis (p = 0.002). Frequency of Clostridium difficile infection was similar during and post-prophylaxis. More antibiotic use was noted among patients without prophylaxis [97%; median 9 (range, 5-24) days] compared to patients with prophylaxis [79%; median 7 (range, 3-36) days, p = 0.04].

CONCLUSION

Although fluoroquinolone prophylaxis reduced the incidence of neutropenic fever and antibiotic use in AHSCT, it did not alter mortality or morbidity.

摘要

目的

尽管氟喹诺酮类预防性用药在自体造血干细胞移植(AHSCT)患者中经常使用,但其对发病率和死亡率的影响尚不确定。本研究调查了近年来AHSCT后喹诺酮类预防性用药的作用。

方法

我们对2013年6月至2015年1月期间连续291例接受AHSCT治疗恶性疾病的成年患者进行了回顾性研究。比较接受诺氟沙星预防性用药的患者和未接受预防性用药的患者的结局。终点指标为预防性用药期间及移植后100天的死亡率、重症监护病房(ICU)入院频率、菌血症的发生率及类型。

结果

291例患者中,252例接受了诺氟沙星预防性用药,39例未接受。两组在预防性用药期间及100天的死亡率以及AHSCT后的中位住院天数方面无差异。在ICU入院频率、感染性休克发生率及ICU住院时间方面未观察到差异。未接受预防性用药的患者中性粒细胞减少性发热发生率(97%)显著高于接受预防性用药的患者(77%)(p = 0.005)。与未接受预防性用药的患者相比,接受预防性用药的患者革兰氏阳性菌血症发生率显著更高(p = 0.002)。艰难梭菌感染在预防性用药期间及用药后频率相似。未接受预防性用药的患者抗生素使用更多[97%;中位9(范围5 - 24)天],而接受预防性用药的患者为[79%;中位7(范围3 - 36)天,p = 0.04]。

结论

尽管氟喹诺酮类预防性用药降低了AHSCT中性粒细胞减少性发热的发生率及抗生素使用,但并未改变死亡率或发病率。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验