• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

苹果酸-乳酸发酵容器与桶内烘烤对红葡萄酒酚类、挥发性和感官特征影响的比较

Comparison between Malolactic Fermentation Container and Barrel Toasting Effects on Phenolic, Volatile, and Sensory Profiles of Red Wines.

作者信息

González-Centeno María Reyes, Chira Kleopatra, Teissedre Pierre-Louis

机构信息

Université Bordeaux, ISVV , EA 4577, Œnologie, 210 Chemin de Leysotte, 33140 Villenave d'Ornon, France.

INRA, ISVV , USC 1366 Œnologie, 210 Chemin de Leysotte, 33140 Villenave d'Ornon, France.

出版信息

J Agric Food Chem. 2017 Apr 26;65(16):3320-3329. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b05497. Epub 2017 Apr 12.

DOI:10.1021/acs.jafc.6b05497
PMID:28366000
Abstract

Ellagitannin and anthocyanin profiles, woody volatile composition, and sensory properties of wines in which malolactic fermentation (MLF) took place in barrels or stainless steel tanks, have been compared after 12 months of barrel aging. Three different barrel toastings were evaluated. Barrel-fermented wines generally presented 1.2-fold higher total phenolics, whereas tank-fermented wines exhibited 1.1- and 1.2-fold greater total proanthocyanidin and anthocyanin contents, respectively. Concerning ellagitannin composition, the barrel toasting effect seemed to be more important than differences due to MLF container. Certain woody and fruity volatiles varied significantly (p < 0.05) depending on whether MLF occurred in barrels or tanks. Barrel-fermented wines were preferred in the mouth, whereas olfactory preference depended on barrel toasting. This is the first study that evaluates the impact of oak wood during MLF on ellagitannin wine composition, as well as the barrel toasting effect on wine attributes during aging when MLF occurred whether in barrels or in tanks.

摘要

在橡木桶中陈酿12个月后,比较了在橡木桶或不锈钢罐中进行苹果酸-乳酸发酵(MLF)的葡萄酒中鞣花单宁和花青素的含量、木质挥发性成分以及感官特性。评估了三种不同的橡木桶烘烤程度。桶中发酵的葡萄酒总酚含量通常高出1.2倍,而罐中发酵的葡萄酒原花青素和花青素总含量分别高出1.1倍和1.2倍。关于鞣花单宁的组成,橡木桶烘烤的影响似乎比MLF容器差异更重要。某些木质和果香挥发性成分因MLF是在橡木桶还是罐中进行而有显著差异(p<0.05)。桶中发酵的葡萄酒口感更佳,而嗅觉偏好则取决于橡木桶烘烤程度。这是第一项评估MLF过程中橡木对葡萄酒鞣花单宁成分的影响,以及当MLF在橡木桶或罐中进行时,橡木桶烘烤对葡萄酒陈酿过程中属性影响的研究。

相似文献

1
Comparison between Malolactic Fermentation Container and Barrel Toasting Effects on Phenolic, Volatile, and Sensory Profiles of Red Wines.苹果酸-乳酸发酵容器与桶内烘烤对红葡萄酒酚类、挥发性和感官特征影响的比较
J Agric Food Chem. 2017 Apr 26;65(16):3320-3329. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b05497. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
2
Use of oak wood during malolactic fermentation and ageing: Impact on chardonnay wine character.橡木桶在苹果酸-乳酸发酵和陈酿中的使用:对霞多丽葡萄酒特征的影响。
Food Chem. 2019 Apr 25;278:460-468. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.11.049. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
3
Ellagitannin content, volatile composition and sensory profile of wines from different countries matured in oak barrels subjected to different toasting methods.不同国家的葡萄酒在经过不同烘烤方式的橡木桶中陈酿后的鞣花单宁含量、挥发性成分及感官特征。
Food Chem. 2016 Nov 1;210:500-11. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.04.139. Epub 2016 Apr 30.
4
Impact of Oak Wood Barrel Tannin Potential and Toasting on White Wine Antioxidant Stability.橡木桶单宁潜力和烘烤对白葡萄酒抗氧化稳定性的影响。
J Agric Food Chem. 2019 Jul 31;67(30):8402-8410. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.9b00517. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
5
Effect of oak wood barrel capacity and utilization time on phenolic and sensorial profile evolution of an Encruzado white wine.橡木桶容量和使用时间对恩克鲁扎多白葡萄酒酚类物质及感官特征演变的影响
J Sci Food Agric. 2017 Nov;97(14):4847-4856. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.8355. Epub 2017 May 16.
6
Oak Wood Volatiles Impact on Red Wine Fruity Aroma Perception in Various Matrices.橡木木屑挥发物对不同基质中红葡萄酒果香感知的影响。
J Agric Food Chem. 2020 Nov 25;68(47):13319-13330. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.0c00583. Epub 2020 Apr 14.
7
Impact of alternative technique to ageing using oak chips in alcoholic or in malolactic fermentation on volatile and sensory composition of red wines.橡木片在酒精发酵或苹果酸-乳酸发酵中用于陈酿替代技术对红葡萄酒挥发性和感官成分的影响。
Food Chem. 2012 Sep 15;134(2):851-63. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.02.194. Epub 2012 Mar 7.
8
Wines in contact with oak wood: the impact of the variety (Carménère and Cabernet Sauvignon), format (barrels, chips and staves), and aging time on the phenolic composition.与橡木接触的葡萄酒:品种(佳美娜和赤霞珠)、形式(桶、片和板条)和陈酿时间对酚类成分的影响。
J Sci Food Agric. 2019 Jan 15;99(1):436-448. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.9205. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
9
Effect of micro-oxygenation and wood type on the phenolic composition and color of an aged red wine.微氧处理和橡木桶类型对陈酿红葡萄酒酚类组成和颜色的影响。
J Agric Food Chem. 2009 Dec 23;57(24):11498-509. doi: 10.1021/jf902173d.
10
Extraction of oak volatiles and ellagitannins compounds and sensory profile of wine aged with French winewoods subjected to different toasting methods: behaviour during storage.橡木挥发物和鞣花单宁化合物的提取以及经不同烘烤方法处理的法国橡木桶陈酿葡萄酒的感官特征:贮藏期间的变化。
Food Chem. 2013 Sep 1;140(1-2):168-77. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.02.049. Epub 2013 Feb 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Winemaking Techniques on the Phenolic Composition and Antioxidant Properties of Touriga Nacional Wines.酿酒技术对国产多瑞加葡萄酒酚类成分及抗氧化特性的影响。
Molecules. 2025 Apr 3;30(7):1601. doi: 10.3390/molecules30071601.
2
Evolution of the Crown Procyanidins' Tetramer during Winemaking and Aging of Red Wine.红酒酿造及陈酿过程中花青素四聚体的演变
Foods. 2022 Oct 13;11(20):3194. doi: 10.3390/foods11203194.
3
Biotechnological Innovations and Therapeutic Application of Pediococcus and Lactic Acid Bacteria: The Next-Generation Microorganism.
嗜热栖热放线菌和乳酸菌的生物技术创新与治疗应用:下一代微生物
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Feb 14;9:802031. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.802031. eCollection 2021.
4
The Effect of Different Oak Products Used during Fermentation and Ageing on the Sensory Properties of a White Wine over Time.发酵和陈酿过程中使用的不同橡木制品对一款白葡萄酒随时间变化的感官特性的影响。
Foods. 2020 Sep 2;9(9):1220. doi: 10.3390/foods9091220.
5
Disease Resistant Bouquet Vine Varieties: Assessment of the Phenolic, Aromatic, and Sensory Potential of Their Wines.抗病花蔓葡萄品种:其葡萄酒的酚类、芳香和感官特性评估。
Biomolecules. 2019 Nov 27;9(12):793. doi: 10.3390/biom9120793.