Suppr超能文献

Talent和Endurant覆膜支架中期结果的比较。

Comparison of midterm results for the Talent and Endurant stent graft.

作者信息

't Mannetje Yannick W, Cuypers Philippe W M, Saleem Ben R, Bode Aron S, Teijink Joep A W, van Sambeek Marc R H M

机构信息

Department of Vascular Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands; Department of Epidemiology, CAPHRI Research School, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Department of Vascular Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2017 Sep;66(3):735-742. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.01.022. Epub 2017 Mar 31.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Stent graft evolution is often addressed as a cause for improved outcomes of endovascular aneurysm repair for patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm. In this study, we directly compared the midterm result of Endurant stent graft with its predecessor, the Talent stent graft (both Medtronic, Santa Rosa, Calif).

METHODS

Patient treated from January 2005 to December 2010 in a single tertiary center in The Netherlands with a Talent or Endurant stent graft were eligible for inclusion. Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms or patients with previous aortic surgery were excluded. The primary end point was the Kaplan-Meier estimated freedom from secondary interventions. Secondary end points were perioperative outcomes and indications for secondary interventions.

RESULTS

In total, 221 patients were included (131 Endurant and 90 Talent). At baseline, the median aortic bifurcation was narrower for the Endurant (30 mm vs 39 mm; P < .001). Median follow-up was 64.1 ± 37.9 months and 59.2 ± 25.3 months for Talent and Endurant, respectively. The estimated freedom from secondary interventions at 30 days, 1 year, 5 years, and 7 years was 94.3%, 89.4%, 72.2%, and 64.1% for Talent and 96.8%, 89.3%, 75.2%, and 69.2% for Endurant (P = .528). The indication for secondary interventions does differ; more patients required an intervention for a proximal neck-related complication (type Ia endoleak or migration) in the Talent group (18.2% vs 4.8%; P = .001), whereas more interventions for iliac limb stenosis were seen in the Endurant group (0.0% vs 4.8%; P = .044). In a binomial regression analysis, suprarenal angulation, infrarenal neck length, and type of stent graft were independent predictors of neck-related complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Evolution from the Talent stent graft into the Endurant has resulted in significant reduction of infrarenal neck-related complications; on the other hand, iliac interventions increased. The overall midterm secondary intervention rate was comparable.

摘要

目的

支架型人工血管的发展常被视为腹主动脉瘤患者血管内动脉瘤修复术预后改善的一个原因。在本研究中,我们直接比较了Endurant支架型人工血管与其前身Talent支架型人工血管(均为美敦力公司,加利福尼亚州圣罗莎)的中期结果。

方法

2005年1月至2010年12月在荷兰一家三级中心接受Talent或Endurant支架型人工血管治疗的患者符合纳入标准。排除破裂性腹主动脉瘤患者或既往有主动脉手术史的患者。主要终点是采用Kaplan-Meier法估计的无二次干预的自由度。次要终点是围手术期结果和二次干预的指征。

结果

共纳入221例患者(131例使用Endurant,90例使用Talent)。基线时,Endurant组的主动脉分叉中位数更窄(30 mm对39 mm;P <.001)。Talent组和Endurant组的中位随访时间分别为64.1±37.9个月和59.2±25.3个月。Talent组在30天、1年、5年和7年时估计的无二次干预的自由度分别为94.3%、89.4%、72.2%和64.1%,Endurant组分别为96.8%、89.3%、75.2%和69.2%(P =.528)。二次干预的指征确实有所不同;Talent组更多患者因近端颈部相关并发症(Ia型内漏或移位)需要干预(18.2%对4.8%;P =.001),而Endurant组髂支狭窄的干预更多(0.0%对4.8%;P =.044)。在二项回归分析中,肾上角度、肾下颈部长度和支架型人工血管类型是颈部相关并发症的独立预测因素。

结论

从Talent支架型人工血管发展到Endurant支架型人工血管已导致肾下颈部相关并发症显著减少;另一方面,髂部干预增加。总体中期二次干预率相当。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验