Oshiro Yoshiko, Mizumoto Masashi, Okumura Toshiyuki, Fukuda Kuniaki, Fukumitsu Nobuyoshi, Abei Masato, Ishikawa Hitoshi, Takizawa Daichi, Sakurai Hideyuki
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Japan; Tsukuba Medical Center Hospital, Japan.
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Japan.
Radiother Oncol. 2017 May;123(2):240-245. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.03.004. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of repeated proton beam therapy (PBT) and to analyze the dose-volume relationship.
A retrospective analysis was performed in 83 patients who received definitive repeated PBT. Proton beams were delivered with expiratory gating. The numbers of treatment courses were 2, 3, and 4 in 68, 12, and 3 patients, respectively. MIM software was used for dose analysis.
The planned median total dose was 70.5 GyE for all tumors and the median doses for the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th treatments were 71.0, 70.0, 70.0, and 69.3 GyE, respectively. There was no severe acute toxicity, and no radiation-induced liver dysfunction (RILD) was observed. The median overall survival (OS) period from the first PBT was 61months (95% CI: 50-71months), and the 2- and 5-year OS rates were 87.5% (95%CI: 80.2-94.8%) and 49.4% (95%CI: 37.6-61.2%), respectively. The maximal delivered dose to the liver ranged from 66.7 to 248.1 GyE (mean: 124.93 GyE) and the mean liver dose ranged from 5.4 to 66.5 GyE (mean: 24.23 GyE).
Repeated PBT was well tolerated and safe, even though the liver doses in many patients deviated substantially from well-known critical levels for RILD.
评估重复质子束治疗(PBT)的可行性和疗效,并分析剂量-体积关系。
对83例接受确定性重复PBT的患者进行回顾性分析。质子束通过呼气门控技术输送。治疗疗程数分别为2个、3个和4个的患者有68例、12例和3例。使用MIM软件进行剂量分析。
所有肿瘤的计划中位总剂量为70.5 GyE,第1次、第2次、第3次和第4次治疗的中位剂量分别为71.0 GyE、70.0 GyE、70.0 GyE和69.3 GyE。未观察到严重急性毒性反应,也未观察到放射性肝损伤(RILD)。从首次PBT开始计算的中位总生存期(OS)为61个月(95%CI:50 - 71个月),2年和5年OS率分别为87.5%(95%CI:80.2 - 94.8%)和49.4%(95%CI:37.6 - 61.2%)。肝脏接受的最大剂量范围为66.7至248.1 GyE(平均:124.93 GyE),平均肝脏剂量范围为5.4至66.5 GyE(平均:24.23 GyE)。
重复PBT耐受性良好且安全,尽管许多患者的肝脏剂量显著偏离了已知的RILD临界水平。