Little Peter C, Pennell Kelly G
Department of Anthropology, Rhode Island College, Providence, RI, USA.
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Environ Sociol. 2017;3(2):145-154. doi: 10.1080/23251042.2016.1224528. Epub 2016 Oct 12.
Investigation of indoor air quality has been on the upswing in recent years. In this article, we focus on how the transport of subsurface vapors into indoor air spaces, a process known as "vapor intrusion," (VI) is defined and addressed. For environmental engineers and physical scientists who specialize in this emerging indoor environmental exposure science, VI is notoriously difficult to characterize, leading the regulatory community to seek improved science-based understandings of VI pathways and exposures. Yet despite the recent growth in VI science and competition between environmental consulting companies, VI studies have largely overlooked the social and political field in which VI problems emerge and are experienced by those at risk. To balance and inform current VI studies, this article explores VI science and policy and develops a critique of what we call "source science politics." Drawing inspiration from the creative synthesis of social and environmental science/engineering perspectives, the article offers a transdisciplinary approach to VI that highlights collaboration with social scientists and impacted communities and cultivates epistemic empathy.
近年来,室内空气质量调查呈上升趋势。在本文中,我们关注地下蒸汽进入室内空间的过程,即所谓的“蒸汽侵入”(VI)是如何定义和处理的。对于专门研究这一新兴室内环境暴露科学的环境工程师和物理科学家来说,蒸汽侵入极难表征,这导致监管机构寻求对蒸汽侵入途径和暴露情况有更完善的基于科学的理解。然而,尽管近年来蒸汽侵入科学有所发展,且环境咨询公司之间存在竞争,但蒸汽侵入研究在很大程度上忽视了蒸汽侵入问题出现以及风险人群所经历的社会和政治领域。为了平衡并为当前的蒸汽侵入研究提供信息,本文探讨了蒸汽侵入科学与政策,并对我们所称的“源科学政治”进行了批判。本文从社会和环境科学/工程视角的创造性综合中汲取灵感,提供了一种跨学科的蒸汽侵入研究方法,强调与社会科学家和受影响社区的合作,并培养认知同理心。