Khawcharoenporn Thana, Phetsuksiri Benjawan, Rudeeaneksin Janisara, Srisungngam Sopa, Apisarnthanarak Anucha
Division of Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University.
National Institute of Health, Department of Medical Sciences, Ministry of Public Health.
Jpn J Infect Dis. 2017 Sep 25;70(5):502-506. doi: 10.7883/yoken.JJID.2016.480. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
Optimal testing strategies for diagnosing latent tuberculosis infection and the administration of isoniazid preventive therapy (IPT) remain uncertain among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients. A 4-year prospective study was conducted among Thai HIV-infected patients who underwent simultaneous tuberculin skin test (TST) and QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube Test (QFT-IT) at care entry. Based on baseline test results, patients were categorized into the following 4 groups: i) QFT-IT-positive, TST-reactive; ii) QFT-IT-positive, TST-non-reactive; iii) QFT-IT-negative, TST-reactive; and iv) QFT-IT-negative, TST-non-reactive. The QFT-IT-positive patients were offered 9-month IPT and were QFT-IT tested annually. Of the 150 enrolled patients, 8, 12, 16, and 114 patients were assigned to groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Sixteen of 19 QFT-IT-positive patients (84%) completed IPT. The incidence of tuberculosis was significantly higher in patients who declined IPT than in those underwent treatment (11.11 vs. 0 case/100 patient-year; P < 0.001). Among the 16 patients completing IPT, 11 (69%) and 2 (12%) had QFT-IT reversion at 1 and 2 years after IPT, respectively. The remaining 3 (19%) did not demonstrate any reversion, and their baseline interferon-γ (IFN-γ) levels were above 1.2 IU/mL. Initial QFT-IT-guided IPT was effective in preventing tuberculosis. Serial QFT-IT for evaluating IPT effectiveness had limitations because of delayed or lack of reversion, especially for patients with high baseline IFN-γ levels.
在人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)感染患者中,用于诊断潜伏性结核感染和给予异烟肼预防性治疗(IPT)的最佳检测策略仍不明确。对泰国HIV感染患者进行了一项为期4年的前瞻性研究,这些患者在开始接受治疗时同时进行了结核菌素皮肤试验(TST)和全血γ干扰素释放试验(QFT-IT)。根据基线检测结果,患者被分为以下4组:i)QFT-IT阳性,TST反应性;ii)QFT-IT阳性,TST无反应性;iii)QFT-IT阴性,TST反应性;iv)QFT-IT阴性,TST无反应性。QFT-IT阳性的患者接受9个月的IPT治疗,并每年进行QFT-IT检测。在150名登记患者中,分别有8、12、16和114名患者被分配到第1、2、3和4组。19名QFT-IT阳性患者中有16名(84%)完成了IPT治疗。拒绝接受IPT治疗的患者结核病发病率显著高于接受治疗的患者(11.11 vs. 0例/100患者年;P<0.001)。在完成IPT治疗的16名患者中,分别有11名(69%)和2名(12%)在IPT治疗后1年和2年出现QFT-IT转阴。其余3名(19%)未出现任何转阴情况,其基线干扰素-γ(IFN-γ)水平高于1.2 IU/mL。初始QFT-IT指导的IPT治疗对预防结核病有效。由于转阴延迟或未转阴,特别是对于基线IFN-γ水平较高的患者,连续进行QFT-IT以评估IPT疗效存在局限性。