Rady Mohamed Y, Verheijde Joseph L
1 Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science and Department of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
2 Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
Med Leg J. 2017 Sep;85(3):148-154. doi: 10.1177/0025817217702289. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
Mr Justice Baker delivered the Oxford Shrieval Lecture 'A Matter of Life and Death' on 11 October 2016. The lecture created public controversies about who can authorise withdrawal of assisted nutrition and hydration (ANH) in disorders of consciousness (DOC). The law requires court permission in 'best interests' decisions before ANH withdrawal only in permanent vegetative state and minimally conscious state. Some clinicians favour abandoning the need for court approval on the basis that clinicians are already empowered to withdraw ANH in other common conditions of DOC (e.g. coma, neurological disorders, etc.) based on their best interests assessment without court oversight. We set out a rationale in support of court oversight of best interests decisions in ANH withdrawal intended to end life in any person with DOC (who will lack relevant decision-making capacity). This ensures the safety of the general public and the protection of vulnerable disabled persons in society.
贝克法官于2016年10月11日发表了牛津郡治安官讲座《生死攸关之事》。该讲座引发了关于在意识障碍(DOC)情况下谁能授权停止辅助营养和水分补充(ANH)的公众争议。法律规定,仅在永久植物状态和最低意识状态下,在基于“最佳利益”决定停止ANH之前需要法院许可。一些临床医生主张放弃法院批准的必要性,理由是临床医生已经有权在DOC的其他常见情况(如昏迷、神经疾病等)下,根据他们对最佳利益的评估而停止ANH,无需法院监督。我们阐述了一个理由,以支持对旨在结束任何患有DOC(将缺乏相关决策能力)的人的生命的停止ANH的最佳利益决定进行法院监督。这确保了公众的安全以及社会中弱势残疾人的保护。
Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2016-12-14
Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 2017-1-1