文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

英国对意识障碍患者生命终末期停止辅助营养和水分供给的司法监督:生死攸关之事。

Judicial oversight of life-ending withdrawal of assisted nutrition and hydration in disorders of consciousness in the United Kingdom: A matter of life and death.

作者信息

Rady Mohamed Y, Verheijde Joseph L

机构信息

1 Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science and Department of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, AZ, USA.

2 Scottsdale, AZ, USA.

出版信息

Med Leg J. 2017 Sep;85(3):148-154. doi: 10.1177/0025817217702289. Epub 2017 Apr 3.


DOI:10.1177/0025817217702289
PMID:28368210
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5580785/
Abstract

Mr Justice Baker delivered the Oxford Shrieval Lecture 'A Matter of Life and Death' on 11 October 2016. The lecture created public controversies about who can authorise withdrawal of assisted nutrition and hydration (ANH) in disorders of consciousness (DOC). The law requires court permission in 'best interests' decisions before ANH withdrawal only in permanent vegetative state and minimally conscious state. Some clinicians favour abandoning the need for court approval on the basis that clinicians are already empowered to withdraw ANH in other common conditions of DOC (e.g. coma, neurological disorders, etc.) based on their best interests assessment without court oversight. We set out a rationale in support of court oversight of best interests decisions in ANH withdrawal intended to end life in any person with DOC (who will lack relevant decision-making capacity). This ensures the safety of the general public and the protection of vulnerable disabled persons in society.

摘要

贝克法官于2016年10月11日发表了牛津郡治安官讲座《生死攸关之事》。该讲座引发了关于在意识障碍(DOC)情况下谁能授权停止辅助营养和水分补充(ANH)的公众争议。法律规定,仅在永久植物状态和最低意识状态下,在基于“最佳利益”决定停止ANH之前需要法院许可。一些临床医生主张放弃法院批准的必要性,理由是临床医生已经有权在DOC的其他常见情况(如昏迷、神经疾病等)下,根据他们对最佳利益的评估而停止ANH,无需法院监督。我们阐述了一个理由,以支持对旨在结束任何患有DOC(将缺乏相关决策能力)的人的生命的停止ANH的最佳利益决定进行法院监督。这确保了公众的安全以及社会中弱势残疾人的保护。

相似文献

[1]
Judicial oversight of life-ending withdrawal of assisted nutrition and hydration in disorders of consciousness in the United Kingdom: A matter of life and death.

Med Leg J. 2017-9

[2]
A matter of life and death: controversy at the interface between clinical and legal decision-making in prolonged disorders of consciousness.

J Med Ethics. 2017-7

[3]
A matter of life and death.

J Med Ethics. 2017-7

[4]
Dying too soon or living too long? Withdrawing treatment from patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness after Re Y.

BMC Med Ethics. 2019-12-30

[5]
Court applications for withdrawal of artificial nutrition and hydration from patients in a permanent vegetative state: family experiences.

J Med Ethics. 2016-1

[6]
Survey of British clinicians' views on management of patients in persistent vegetative state.

Lancet. 1996-7-6

[7]
Withdrawing clinically assisted nutrition and hydration (CANH) in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness: is there still a role for the courts?

J Med Ethics. 2017-7

[8]
Withdrawal of artificial nutrition and hydration for patients in a permanent vegetative state: changing tack.

Bioethics. 2010-10-6

[9]
Food as Love: Ethical and Moral Dilemmas in Withdrawal of Artificial Nutrition and Hydration in the Minimally Conscious State.

J Palliat Care. 2023-10

[10]
Withdrawing artificial nutrition and hydration from minimally conscious and vegetative patients: family perspectives.

J Med Ethics. 2015-2

引用本文的文献

[1]
The experience of nurses when providing care across acts that may be perceived as death hastening: A qualitative evidence synthesis.

Palliat Med. 2025-6

[2]
[The role of end-of-life palliative sedation: medical and ethical aspects - Review].

Braz J Anesthesiol. 2019

本文引用的文献

[1]
Covert narrative capacity: Mental life in patients thought to lack consciousness.

Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2016-12-14

[2]
Neuroethics and Disorders of Consciousness: Discerning Brain States in Clinical Practice and Research.

AMA J Ethics. 2016-12-1

[3]
A matter of life and death: controversy at the interface between clinical and legal decision-making in prolonged disorders of consciousness.

J Med Ethics. 2017-7

[4]
Pain Perception in Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome May Challenge the Interruption of Artificial Nutrition and Hydration: Neuroethics in Action.

Front Neurol. 2016-11-16

[5]
Mapping preserved real-world cognition in severely brain-injured patients.

Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 2017-1-1

[6]
Causes and consequences of delays in treatment-withdrawal from PVS patients: a case study of [2016] EWCOP 32.

J Med Ethics. 2017-7

[7]
Back to the bedside? Making clinical decisions in patients with prolonged unconsciousness.

J Med Ethics. 2017-7

[8]
Evidence for Neurotoxicity Due to Morphine or Hydromorphone Use in Renal Impairment: A Systematic Review.

J Palliat Med. 2016-11

[9]
The Role of Neuroimaging Techniques in Establishing Diagnosis, Prognosis and Therapy in Disorders of Consciousness.

Open Neuroimag J. 2016-5-13

[10]
Pharmacokinetics of Morphine, Morphine-3-Glucuronide and Morphine-6-Glucuronide in Terminally Ill Adult Patients.

Clin Pharmacokinet. 2016-6

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索