1Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; 2Department of Developmental Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands; 3Dutch Foundation for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing Child, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 4Willem-Alexander Children's Hospital, Department of Social Pediatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; 5Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; and 6Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Ear Hear. 2017 Sep/Oct;38(5):588-597. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000427.
The first aim of this study was to examine various aspects of Theory of Mind (ToM) development in young children with moderate hearing loss (MHL) compared with hearing peers. The second aim was to examine the relation between language abilities and ToM in both groups. The third aim was to compare the sequence of ToM development between children with MHL and hearing peers.
Forty-four children between 3 and 5 years old with MHL (35 to 70 dB HL) who preferred to use spoken language were identified from a nationwide study on hearing loss in young children. These children were compared with 101 hearing peers. Children were observed during several tasks to measure intention understanding, the acknowledgement of the other's desires, and belief understanding. Parents completed two scales of the child development inventory to assess expressive language and language comprehension in all participants. Objective language test scores were available from the medical files of children with MHL.
Children with MHL showed comparable levels of intention understanding but lower levels of both desire and belief understanding than hearing peers. Parents reported lower language abilities in children with MHL compared with hearing peers. Yet, the language levels of children with MHL were within the average range compared with test normative samples. A stronger relation between language and ToM was found in the hearing children than in children with MHL. The expected developmental sequence of ToM skills was divergent in approximately one-fourth of children with MHL, when compared with hearing children.
Children with MHL have more difficulty in their ToM reasoning than hearing peers, despite the fact that their language abilities lie within the average range compared with test normative samples.
本研究的首要目的是检验中度听力损失(MHL)儿童与听力正常儿童在心理理论(ToM)发展的各个方面的差异。其次,研究旨在检验两组儿童的语言能力与 ToM 之间的关系。第三,比较 MHL 儿童与听力正常儿童的 ToM 发展顺序。
本研究从一项全国性的儿童听力损失研究中筛选出 44 名 3 至 5 岁、有口语偏好且存在中重度听力损失(35-70dBHL)的儿童,与 101 名听力正常儿童进行比较。通过观察儿童在意图理解、承认他人愿望和信念理解等多项任务中的表现来评估儿童的心理理论发展。所有参与者的父母均填写儿童发展量表,评估儿童的表达性语言和语言理解能力。MHL 儿童的客观语言测试成绩可从其医疗档案中获取。
与听力正常儿童相比,MHL 儿童的意图理解能力相当,但在愿望和信念理解方面的得分较低。MHL 儿童的父母报告称,其语言能力较听力正常儿童差。但与测试常模样本相比,MHL 儿童的语言水平仍处于平均水平范围内。与 MHL 儿童相比,听力正常儿童的语言与 ToM 之间的关系更为密切。与听力正常儿童相比,大约四分之一的 MHL 儿童的心理理论技能发展顺序存在差异。
尽管 MHL 儿童的语言能力与测试常模样本相比处于平均水平范围内,但他们在心理理论推理方面的表现比听力正常儿童更差。