Suppr超能文献

提高社区人群的健康素养:进展综述

Improving health literacy in community populations: a review of progress.

作者信息

Nutbeam Don, McGill Bronwyn, Premkumar Pav

机构信息

Prevention Research Collaboration, Sydney School of Public Health, Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Southampton Education School, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

出版信息

Health Promot Int. 2018 Oct 1;33(5):901-911. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dax015.

Abstract

Governments around the world have adopted national policies and programs to improve health literacy. This paper examines progress in the development of evidence to support these policies from interventions to improve health literacy among community populations. Our review found only a limited number of studies (n=7) that met the criteria for inclusion, with many more influenced by the concept of health literacy but not using it in the design and evaluation. Those included were diverse in setting, population and intended outcomes. All included educational strategies to develop functional health literacy, and a majority designed to improve interactive or critical health literacy skills. Several papers were excluded because they described a protocol for an intervention, but not results, indicating that our review may be early in a cycle of activity in community intervention research. The review methodology may not have captured all relevant studies, but it provides a clear message that the academic interest and attractive rhetoric surrounding health literacy needs to be tested more systematically through intervention experimentation in a wide range of populations using valid and reliable measurement tools. The distinctive influence of the concept of health literacy on the purpose and methodologies of health education and communication is not reflected in many reported interventions at present. Evidence to support the implementation of national policies and programs, and the intervention tools required by community practitioners are not emerging as quickly as needed. This should be addressed as a matter of priority by research funding agencies.

摘要

世界各国政府都制定了国家政策和计划来提高健康素养。本文考察了从社区人群健康素养改善干预措施中获取支持这些政策的证据方面的进展。我们的综述发现,只有少数研究(n = 7)符合纳入标准,更多的研究受到健康素养概念的影响,但在设计和评估中未使用该概念。纳入的研究在背景、人群和预期结果方面各不相同。所有研究都包含发展功能性健康素养的教育策略,大多数旨在提高互动式或批判性健康素养技能。有几篇论文被排除,因为它们描述了干预方案,但没有结果,这表明我们的综述可能处于社区干预研究活动周期的早期阶段。综述方法可能没有涵盖所有相关研究,但它传递了一个明确的信息,即围绕健康素养的学术兴趣和诱人的言辞需要通过在广泛人群中使用有效且可靠的测量工具进行干预实验来更系统地检验。目前,许多已报道的干预措施并未体现健康素养概念对健康教育和传播目的及方法的独特影响。支持国家政策和计划实施的证据以及社区从业者所需的干预工具并未如所需那样迅速出现。研究资助机构应将此作为优先事项加以解决。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验