Suppr超能文献

群体产前护理积极改变护理体验:马拉维一项有效性试验的结果

Group antenatal care positively transforms the care experience: Results of an effectiveness trial in Malawi.

作者信息

Patil Crystal L, Norr Kathleen F, Kapito Esnath, Liu Li C, Mei Xiaohan, Chodzaza Elizabeth, Chorwe-Sungani Genesis, Kafulafula Ursula, Abrams Elizabeth T, Desloge Allissa, Gresh Ashley, Jeremiah Rohan D, Patel Dhruvi R, Batchelder Anne, Wang Heidy, Faydenko Jocelyn, Rising Sharon S, Chirwa Ellen

机构信息

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.

University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Jun 18;20(6):e0317171. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317171. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We developed and tested a Centering-based group antenatal (ANC) model in Malawi, integrating health promotion for HIV prevention and mental health. We present effectiveness data and examine congruence with only the Group ANC theory of change model, which identifies key processes as supportive relationships, empowered partners in learning and care, and meaningful services, leading to better ANC experiences and outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted a hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial at seven clinics in Blantyre District, Malawi, comparing outcomes for 1887 pregnant women randomly assigned to Group ANC or Individual ANC. Group effects on outcomes were summarized and evaluated using t-tests, Mann-Whitney, or Chi-squared tests. Adjusted for seven individual and two clinic-level baseline covariates, point estimates are reported for continuous outcomes using multivariable linear regression models. Adjusted for the same covariates, odds ratios are reported for categorical outcomes using logistic regression models. All statistical tests were two-sided, controlling for a Type I error probability of 0.01 due to multiple testing.

FINDINGS

Women in Group ANC had higher peer connectedness and pregnancy-related empowerment, recalled receiving more services, and discussed more health promotion topics. They experienced less wait time, greater satisfaction with care (Estimate = 1.21, 99% CI = 0.07, 2.35), and had a higher mean number of ANC contacts (Estimate = 0.74, 99% CI = 0.50, 0.98). Most women preferred Group ANC for a future pregnancy (81% in Individual ANC; 95% in Group ANC). Women in Group ANC had more diverse diets (Estimate = 0.35, 99% CI = 0.17, 0.53), were better prepared for birth (Estimate 0.32, 99% CI = 0.16, 0.48), more likely to use condoms consistently (OR= 1.07, 99% CI = 1.00, 1.14) and communicated more with partners. They reported less mental distress in late pregnancy (Estimate = -0.61, 99% CI = -1.20, -0.02). Exclusive breastfeeding, partner HIV testing and disclosure, facility-based delivery, postnatal care attendance, postpartum family planning, and low birth weight did not differ by ANC type.

CONCLUSIONS

This effectiveness study of Malawi Group ANC, the first trial with individual randomization in a low-income country, maps outcomes to the theory of change, enhancing our understanding of Group ANC's diverse positive impacts. The integration of typically neglected health promotion topics into the model highlights its flexibility to address changing local and global needs. Based on study results, the Malawi Ministry of Health is introducing Group ANC at district-level trainings and exploring the logistics for nationwide adoption. With momentum and political will, better care and a positive healthcare experience can be achieved for women, infants, and families in Malawi and globally.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03673709.

摘要

背景

我们在马拉维开发并测试了一种基于围产期中心的群体产前保健(ANC)模式,该模式整合了预防艾滋病毒和促进心理健康的健康促进措施。我们展示了有效性数据,并仅与群体产前保健变革理论模型进行了一致性检验,该模型将关键过程确定为支持性的关系、在学习和护理中被赋予权力的伙伴以及有意义的服务,从而带来更好的产前保健体验和结果。

方法

我们在马拉维布兰太尔区的七家诊所进行了一项混合有效性 - 实施试验,比较了1887名随机分配到群体产前保健组或个体产前保健组的孕妇的结局。使用t检验、曼 - 惠特尼检验或卡方检验对群体对结局的影响进行总结和评估。针对七个个体和两个诊所层面的基线协变量进行调整后,使用多变量线性回归模型报告连续结局的点估计值。针对相同的协变量进行调整后,使用逻辑回归模型报告分类结局的比值比。所有统计检验均为双侧检验,由于多次检验,将I型错误概率控制在0.01。

结果

群体产前保健组的女性具有更高的同伴联系和与怀孕相关的赋权感,回忆起接受了更多的服务,并讨论了更多的健康促进话题。她们等待时间更短,对护理的满意度更高(估计值 = 1.21,99%置信区间 = 0.07,2.35),产前保健接触的平均次数更多(估计值 = 0.74,99%置信区间 = 0.50,0.98)。大多数女性在未来怀孕时更喜欢群体产前保健(个体产前保健组为81%;群体产前保健组为95%)。群体产前保健组的女性饮食更多样化(估计值 = 0.35,99%置信区间 = 0.17,0.53),为分娩做了更好的准备(估计值0.32,99%置信区间 = 0.16,0.48),更有可能持续使用避孕套(比值比 = 1.07,99%置信区间 = 1.00,1.14),并且与伴侣沟通更多。她们报告在妊娠晚期的心理困扰更少(估计值 = -0.61,99%置信区间 = -1.20,-0.02)。纯母乳喂养、伴侣艾滋病毒检测与告知、设施分娩、产后护理就诊、产后计划生育以及低出生体重在不同类型的产前保健组之间没有差异。

结论

这项对马拉维群体产前保健的有效性研究是低收入国家首次进行的个体随机试验,将结局与变革理论进行了映射,增强了我们对群体产前保健多种积极影响的理解。将通常被忽视的健康促进主题纳入该模式突出了其满足不断变化的当地和全球需求的灵活性。根据研究结果,马拉维卫生部正在地区层面的培训中引入群体产前保健,并探索在全国范围内推广的后勤保障。有了动力和政治意愿,马拉维和全球的妇女、婴儿和家庭能够获得更好的护理和积极的医疗体验。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03673709

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9622/12176302/dc43d6e3274b/pone.0317171.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验