Park Gwan Cheol, Jung Jin-A, Bae Kyun-Seop, Lim Hyeong-Seok
Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Sep;57(9):1088-1096. doi: 10.1002/jcph.896. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
Some prospective, randomized clinical trials, including ATAC and BIG 1-98, demonstrated superior treatment effect of third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs) versus tamoxifen in postoperative therapy for patients with breast cancer. In retrospective genotyping analyses of the 2 studies using tumor samples, no difference in the treatment effect of tamoxifen was observed by CYP2D6 genotypes. However, those analyses did not consider loss of heterozygosity that could have occurred when genotyping using tumor tissue. The present simulation study aimed to comparatively evaluate the treatment effect of tamoxifen versus AIs of anastrozole and letrozole by CYP2D6 genotypes. A meta-analysis was conducted to estimate disease-free survival (DFS) hazard ratios of CYP2D6 genotypes representing extensive metabolizers (EMs), HR , versus intermediate metabolizers (IMs)/poor metabolizers (PMs), HR , using previous study results in which genotypes were determined using blood samples. Based on known allele frequencies, the CYP2D6 genotype distribution of participants in ATAC and BIG 1-98 trials were simulated. Subsequently, DFS HRs of AIs versus tamoxifen by CYP2D6 genotypes (HR for EMs, HR for IMs/PMs) were estimated via regression analyses using NONMEM, based on the simulated genotype distributions, HR , and HRs, of AIs versus tamoxifen (HR ) reported in the ATAC and BIG 1-98 trials. Median HR (95% prediction interval [PI]) was 0.43 (0.23-0.79) and 0.40 (0.22-0.73) for the ATAC and BIG 1-98 trials, respectively. However, the corresponding HR values were 0.97 (0.84-1.11) and 0.91 (0.77-1.08), respectively. These results suggest that in patients with the CYP2D6 genotype representing EMs, the treatment effect of tamoxifen is comparable to that of AIs.
包括ATAC和BIG 1-98在内的一些前瞻性随机临床试验表明,在乳腺癌患者术后治疗中,第三代芳香化酶抑制剂(AIs)的治疗效果优于他莫昔芬。在使用肿瘤样本对这两项研究进行的回顾性基因分型分析中,未观察到CYP2D6基因型对他莫昔芬治疗效果的影响。然而,这些分析没有考虑到使用肿瘤组织进行基因分型时可能发生的杂合性缺失。本模拟研究旨在比较评估CYP2D6基因型对他莫昔芬与阿那曲唑和来曲唑这两种AIs治疗效果的影响。进行了一项荟萃分析,以使用先前研究结果(其中使用血液样本确定基因型)来估计代表广泛代谢者(EMs)的CYP2D6基因型的无病生存(DFS)风险比(HR ),与中间代谢者(IMs)/慢代谢者(PMs)的风险比(HR )。根据已知的等位基因频率,模拟了ATAC和BIG 1-98试验参与者的CYP2D6基因型分布。随后,基于模拟的基因型分布、HR 以及ATAC和BIG 1-98试验中报告的AIs与他莫昔芬的风险比(HR ),使用NONMEM通过回归分析估计CYP2D6基因型的AIs与他莫昔芬的DFS风险比(EMs的HR ,IMs/PMs的HR )。ATAC和BIG 1-98试验的中位HR(95%预测区间[PI])分别为0.43(0.23 - 0.79)和0.40(0.22 - 0.73)。然而,相应的HR值分别为0.97(0.84 - 1.11)和0.91(0.77 - 1.08)。这些结果表明,在具有代表EMs的CYP2D6基因型的患者中,他莫昔芬的治疗效果与AIs相当。