Driessen Mieke M P, Meijboom Folkert J, Hui Wei, Dragulescu Andreea, Mertens Luc, Friedberg Mark K
Department of Cardiology, The Labatt Family Heart Center, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Echocardiography. 2017 Jun;34(6):888-897. doi: 10.1111/echo.13529. Epub 2017 Apr 1.
Right ventricular (RV) pressure overload in the context of pulmonary stenosis (PS) has a much better prognosis than in the context of idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (iPAH), which may be related to differences in global and regional RV remodeling and systolic function. We compared RV mechanics in children with PS to those with iPAH, aiming to identify mechanisms and markers of RV dysfunction.
Eighteen controls, 18 iPAH and 16 PS patients were retrospectively studied. Age, BSA, and sex distribution were comparable. Two-dimensional echocardiography, blood flow and tissue Doppler, and longitudinal RV deformation were analyzed. ANCOVA-including RV systolic pressure (RVSP) and length as covariates-was used to compare patient groups.
RV systolic pressure was higher in iPAH vs PS (96.8±25.4 vs 75.4±18.9 mm Hg, P=.011). Compared to controls, PS patients showed mild dilation (P<.01) and decreased longitudinal deformation (P<.001) at the RV apex. Compared to both PS and controls, iPAH patients showed marked spherical RV dilation (P<.001), reduced global, RV free wall and septal longitudinal deformation (iPAH -22.07%±4.35% vs controls -28.18%±1.69%; -9.98%±4.30% vs -17.45%±2.52%; P<.001) and RV postsystolic shortening (P<.001). RV transverse shortening (radial performance) was increased in PS (31.75%±10.35%; P<.001) but reduced in iPAH (-1.62%±11.11% vs controls 12.00%±7.74%; P<.001).
Children with iPAH demonstrate adverse global and regional RV remodeling and mechanics compared to those with PS. Mechanisms of RV systolic dysfunction in iPAH include decreased longitudinal deformation, decreased or absent transverse shortening, and postsystolic shortening. These markers may be useful to identify children at risk of RV failure.
在肺动脉狭窄(PS)情况下的右心室(RV)压力超负荷,其预后比特发性肺动脉高压(iPAH)情况下要好得多,这可能与整体和局部右心室重塑及收缩功能的差异有关。我们比较了PS患儿与iPAH患儿的右心室力学,旨在确定右心室功能障碍的机制和标志物。
对18名对照者、18名iPAH患者和16名PS患者进行回顾性研究。年龄、体表面积和性别分布具有可比性。分析二维超声心动图、血流和组织多普勒以及右心室纵向变形。采用协方差分析(将右心室收缩压(RVSP)和长度作为协变量)来比较患者组。
iPAH患者的右心室收缩压高于PS患者(96.8±25.4对75.4±18.9 mmHg,P = 0.011)。与对照者相比,PS患者在右心室心尖处表现出轻度扩张(P < 0.01)和纵向变形降低(P < 0.001)。与PS患者和对照者相比,iPAH患者表现出明显的球形右心室扩张(P < 0.001),整体、右心室游离壁和室间隔纵向变形降低(iPAH -22.07%±4.35%对对照者 -28.18%±1.69%;-9.98%±4.30%对 -17.45%±2.52%;P < 0.001)以及右心室收缩后缩短(P < 0.001)。PS患者的右心室横向缩短(径向性能)增加(31.75%±10.35%;P < 0.001),而iPAH患者则降低(-1.62%±11.11%对对照者12.00%±7.74%;P < 0.001)。
与PS患儿相比,iPAH患儿表现出不良的整体和局部右心室重塑及力学改变。iPAH患者右心室收缩功能障碍的机制包括纵向变形降低、横向缩短降低或消失以及收缩后缩短。这些标志物可能有助于识别有右心室衰竭风险的患儿。