Department of Internal Medicine, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, USA.
Department of Medicine, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Dig Endosc. 2017 Nov;29(7):743-748. doi: 10.1111/den.12882. Epub 2017 May 11.
Peri-procedural bridging (PPB) with heparin is recommended for patients with high thromboembolic risk who need to withhold antithrombotic therapy for colonoscopic polypectomy. However, little is known about the bleeding risk from heparin-bridging therapy itself.
MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched through January 2017 for studies that compared the risk of PPB in patients who received heparin-bridging therapy in lieu of antithrombotic agents for colonoscopic polypectomy and those who discontinued antithrombotic agents without receiving heparin. Pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using a random-effects model, generic inverse variance method. Between-study heterogeneity was quantified using the Q statistic and I .
A total of five studies consisting of 2601 patients were identified. A significantly increased risk of PPB among bridged patients compared to non-bridged patients was demonstrated with a pooled OR of 8.29 (95% CI, 4.96-13.87). Statistical heterogeneity was low with I of 0%.
The present study demonstrated a significantly increased risk of PPB among patients who underwent colonoscopic polypectomy and received heparin-bridging therapy in lieu of antithrombotic agents compared to patients who did not receive it.
对于需要停止抗血栓治疗而行结肠镜息肉切除术的高血栓栓塞风险患者,建议使用肝素进行围手术期桥接(PPB)。然而,对于肝素桥接治疗本身的出血风险知之甚少。
通过 2017 年 1 月在 MEDLINE 和 EMBASE 数据库中搜索比较接受肝素桥接治疗代替抗血栓药物行结肠镜息肉切除术的患者与未接受肝素桥接治疗而停止抗血栓药物的患者的 PPB 风险的研究。使用随机效应模型、通用倒数方差法计算汇总优势比(OR)和 95%置信区间(CI)。使用 Q 统计量和 I 来量化研究间异质性。
共确定了 5 项包含 2601 例患者的研究。与未桥接患者相比,桥接患者的 PPB 风险显著增加,汇总 OR 为 8.29(95%CI,4.96-13.87)。异质性较低,I 为 0%。
本研究表明,与未接受肝素桥接治疗的患者相比,接受肝素桥接治疗代替抗血栓药物行结肠镜息肉切除术的患者的 PPB 风险显著增加。