NIOZ Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research, Department of Marine Microbiology and Biogeochemistry, Utrecht University, Den Burg, P.O.Box 59, The Netherlands.
University of Amsterdam, IBED Department of Aquatic Microbiology, Amsterdam, P.O.Box 94248, The Netherlands.
Environ Microbiol. 2017 Jun;19(6):2105-2109. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13739. Epub 2017 May 5.
Huber and collaborators reported in this issue of Environmental Microbiology about freshwater picocyanobacteria that showed phenotypic plasticity in the sense that they appeared as single cells as well as in aggregates. The authors suggested that aggregation might be an inducible defense as a response to the presence of grazers. This has been described for eukaryotic phytoplankton and for the cyanobacterium Microcystis but thus far not for picocyanobacteria. Although inducible defense as an explanation is an attractive possibility, it is also problematic. Aggregation is common among cyanobacteria and it offers many advantages as compared with a free-living lifestyle. Here these advantages are highlighted and the possibility of inducible defense is critically assessed.
休伯尔及其合作者在本期《环境微生物学》中报告了淡水微型蓝藻的表型可塑性,即它们既以单细胞形式存在,也以聚集形式存在。作者认为,聚集可能是一种诱导防御,以应对捕食者的存在。这种现象已经在真核浮游植物和蓝藻微囊藻中有所描述,但迄今为止尚未在微型蓝藻中发现。虽然作为一种解释,诱导防御是一种有吸引力的可能性,但它也存在问题。聚集在蓝藻中很常见,与自由生活方式相比,它具有许多优势。在这里,强调了这些优势,并批判性地评估了诱导防御的可能性。