Dong Tien, Cursio John F, Qadir Samira, Lindenauer Peter K, Ruhnke Gregory W
Section of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Center for Quality, Quality Performance Improvement, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Int J Clin Pract. 2017 Mar;71(3-4). doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12935.
Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is the most common non-obstetrical reason for hospital admission, the leading infectious cause of death, and a target for public reporting. CAP has thus become a target of quality improvement and pay-for-performance efforts. However, the relationship between discharge disposition and readmission risk has not been investigated.
We studied CAP patients admitted to the University of Chicago from 11/2011 to 04/2015. We collected demographic information, comorbidities, laboratory values, vital signs, a modified pneumonia severity index (PSI), length of stay (LOS), clinical instabilities before discharge, discharge disposition and 30-day all-cause readmission. A multivariate logistic regression was performed, specifying readmission as the dependent variable, including as independent variables gender, ethnicity, insurance status, discharge disposition, PSI tertile, the number of clinical instabilities, LOS and comorbidities.
Of the 2892 CAP patients identified, 14.9% were readmitted. The distribution of discharge disposition was: 43.0% home without services, 26.1% home with home health care (HHC), 16.2% to a skilled nursing or subacute rehabilitation facility and 14.8% to an acute rehabilitation or long-term acute care facility. Of patients discharged home with HHC, 20.1% were readmitted, compared to 11.5% discharged home without services. In the multivariate regression model, being discharged home with HHC was associated with a markedly greater risk of readmission (Odds ratio 1.58 [95% confidence interval 1.21-2.07]).
Discharge home with HHC is an independent predictor of readmission risk among hospitalised CAP patients. Discharging providers should carefully consider follow-up care and social factors that may impact the risk of readmission among such patients.
社区获得性肺炎(CAP)是医院非产科住院最常见的原因,是主要的感染性死亡原因,也是公共报告的目标。因此,CAP已成为质量改进和按绩效付费努力的目标。然而,出院处置与再入院风险之间的关系尚未得到研究。
我们研究了2011年11月至2015年4月入住芝加哥大学的CAP患者。我们收集了人口统计学信息、合并症、实验室检查值、生命体征、改良肺炎严重程度指数(PSI)、住院时间(LOS)、出院前的临床不稳定情况、出院处置以及30天全因再入院情况。进行了多因素逻辑回归分析,将再入院作为因变量,将性别、种族、保险状况、出院处置、PSI三分位数、临床不稳定次数、住院时间和合并症作为自变量。
在确定的2892例CAP患者中,14.9%再次入院。出院处置分布情况为:43.0%回家且无需服务,26.1%回家并接受家庭健康护理(HHC),16.2%入住专业护理或亚急性康复机构,14.8%入住急性康复或长期急性护理机构。接受HHC出院回家的患者中,20.1%再次入院,而无需服务出院回家的患者中这一比例为11.5%。在多因素回归模型中,接受HHC出院回家与明显更高的再入院风险相关(比值比1.58 [95%置信区间1.21 - 2.07])。
接受HHC出院回家是住院CAP患者再入院风险的独立预测因素。出院医疗服务提供者应仔细考虑后续护理以及可能影响此类患者再入院风险的社会因素。