Silverman Laura B, Eigsti Inge-Marie, Bennetto Loisa
Division of Neurodevelopmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, New York.
Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut.
Autism Res. 2017 Aug;10(8):1353-1363. doi: 10.1002/aur.1785. Epub 2017 Apr 1.
This study examined whether individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) produce co-speech gestures similarly to typically developing (TD) peers. Participants were 20 youth ages 10-18 years with high-functioning ASD and 21 TD controls matched on age, gender, verbal IQ, and handedness. Gestures were elicited using a classic narrative-retelling task, in which participants watched a Tweety and Sylvester cartoon and retold the cartoon to a confederate. Analyses compared gesture rate, type, and viewpoint (character, observer, dual) across groups. Communicative utility of gestures was measured via naïve coder ratings of whether a movement was a gesture, and the clarity of a gesture's meaning. The ASD group produced shorter narratives and fewer total gestures than the TD group. Accounting for narrative length, the ASD group produced fewer gestures per clause than the TD group; however, proportions of gesture types (iconic, deictic, beat, metaphoric, emblems) did not differ. Most notably, the ASD group's gestures were rated as less clearly gestures in terms of timing and well formedness, with lower certainty ratings for gesture meaning. Gesture clarity and gesture meaning scores were related to diagnostic measures of gesture competence in ASD. Findings suggest that although fluent children and adolescents with ASD use the same type of gestures as controls, their gestures are more difficult to understand, which has significant implications for their communicative abilities more broadly. Autism Res 2017, 10: 1353-1363. © 2017 International Society for Autism Research, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
本研究考察了自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)个体做出伴随言语的手势是否与发育正常(TD)的同龄人相似。参与者为20名年龄在10 - 18岁的高功能ASD青少年以及21名在年龄、性别、言语智商和利手方面匹配的发育正常对照组。通过一项经典的叙事复述任务来引发手势,即参与者观看一段翠儿和傻大猫的卡通片,并向一名同谋复述该卡通片。分析比较了两组之间的手势频率、类型和视角(角色、观察者、双重)。通过外行编码员对手势是否属于手势以及手势含义清晰度的评分来衡量手势的交际效用。与发育正常组相比,ASD组讲述故事的篇幅较短,总的手势数量较少。考虑到故事篇幅,ASD组每个从句的手势数量比发育正常组少;然而,手势类型(象形、指示、节拍、隐喻、象征)的比例并无差异。最值得注意的是,ASD组的手势在时机和形式完整性方面被评为不太清晰的手势,对手势含义的确定性评分较低。手势清晰度和手势含义得分与ASD中手势能力的诊断指标相关。研究结果表明,尽管患有ASD的流畅儿童和青少年使用与对照组相同类型的手势,但他们的手势更难理解,这对他们更广泛的交际能力具有重要意义。《自闭症研究》2017年,第10卷:1353 - 1363页。© 2017国际自闭症研究协会,威利期刊公司