Suppr超能文献

蒽环类药物诱导的阿霉素耐药小鼠白血病P388细胞中的DNA断裂与重封

Anthracycline-induced DNA breaks and resealing in doxorubicin-resistant murine leukemic P388 cells.

作者信息

Maniar N, Krishan A, Israel M, Samy T S

机构信息

Division of Experimental Therapeutics, Papanicolaou Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL.

出版信息

Biochem Pharmacol. 1988 May 1;37(9):1763-72. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(88)90440-6.

Abstract

Energy-dependent drug efflux is believed to be a major factor in cellular resistance to doxorubicin (DOX). However, recent studies have shown that decreased retention alone cannot account for anthracycline resistance, and possibly other factors, such as drug metabolism, free radical scavengers, and altered DNA damage/repair, may be involved. We have measured DOX-induced DNA damage and its repair in P388 cells sensitive (P388/S) and resistant (P388/R) to DOX. Our studies show 2- to 5-fold less DNA damage, measured as protein-associated single-strand DNA breaks, in P388/R cells when compared to similarly treated P388/S cells. The repair of DNA in whole cells, expressed as percent DNA rejoined, was complete in 4 hr in P388/R, whereas no repair was seen in P388/S cells until 20 hr. No difference in repair of DNA lesions was observed when nuclei were used in repair experiments. The absence of repair in sensitive whole cells may be due to high retention or slow drug efflux. Increase of cellular DOX retention by exposure of cells to trifluoperazine (TFP) or verapamil (VPL) did not result in the increase of DNA damage in P388/R cells. DOX analogs, N-trifluoroacetyladriamycin-14-valerate (AD 32), 4'-O-tetrahydropyranyladriamycin (THP-adriamycin), and N-benzyladriamycin-14-valerate (AD 198), induced 2- to 4-fold more DNA damage than DOX in resistant cells. There was no difference in the poly(ADP-ribose) synthesis of P388/S and P388/R cells exposed to DOX or AD 32. Since ADP-ribose polymer synthesis is associated with free radical-induced DNA damage and is indicative of DNA repair by an excision-repair mechanism, data from these studies suggest that DNA breaks in anthracycline-exposed cells may not be due to free radical production but rather to other mechanisms, such as inhibition of DNA topoisomerase II activity. The present studies, in addition to emphasizing the role of DNA damage in resistance, also underscore the relative importance of DNA topoisomerase II function in anthracycline cytotoxicity.

摘要

能量依赖性药物外排被认为是细胞对多柔比星(DOX)耐药的主要因素。然而,最近的研究表明,仅药物潴留减少并不能解释蒽环类药物耐药性,可能还涉及其他因素,如药物代谢、自由基清除剂以及DNA损伤/修复改变。我们已经检测了对DOX敏感(P388/S)和耐药(P388/R)的P388细胞中DOX诱导的DNA损伤及其修复情况。我们的研究表明,与经类似处理的P388/S细胞相比,P388/R细胞中以蛋白质相关单链DNA断裂衡量的DNA损伤减少了2至5倍。以DNA重新连接百分比表示的全细胞DNA修复在P388/R细胞中4小时内完成,而在P388/S细胞中直到20小时才观察到修复。在修复实验中使用细胞核时,未观察到DNA损伤修复的差异。敏感全细胞中缺乏修复可能是由于高潴留或药物外排缓慢。通过将细胞暴露于三氟拉嗪(TFP)或维拉帕米(VPL)来增加细胞对DOX的潴留,并未导致P388/R细胞中DNA损伤增加。DOX类似物,N - 三氟乙酰阿霉素 - 14 - 戊酸酯(AD 32)、4'-O - 四氢吡喃阿霉素(THP - 阿霉素)和N - 苄基阿霉素 - 14 - 戊酸酯(AD 198)在耐药细胞中诱导的DNA损伤比DOX多2至4倍。暴露于DOX或AD 32的P388/S和P388/R细胞的聚(ADP - 核糖)合成没有差异。由于ADP - 核糖聚合物合成与自由基诱导的DNA损伤相关,并且表明通过切除修复机制进行DNA修复,这些研究的数据表明,暴露于蒽环类药物的细胞中的DNA断裂可能不是由于自由基产生,而是由于其他机制,如抑制DNA拓扑异构酶II活性。本研究除了强调DNA损伤在耐药性中的作用外,还强调了DNA拓扑异构酶II功能在蒽环类药物细胞毒性中的相对重要性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验