Suppr超能文献

青少年精神病临床高危人群的合并症诊断。

Comorbid diagnoses for youth at clinical high risk of psychosis.

机构信息

Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Department of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Department of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Schizophr Res. 2017 Dec;190:90-95. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2017.03.043. Epub 2017 Mar 31.

Abstract

Several studies have demonstrated that youth at clinical high risk (CHR) of developing psychosis have a high prevalence of comorbid psychiatric disorders. Less is known about the impact of comorbid diagnoses on later conversion to psychosis and the change over time. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency and distribution of psychiatric diagnoses at baseline and over time in the North American Prodrome Longitudinal Study (NAPLS 2) and the role of comorbid diagnoses in conversion to psychosis. The NAPLS 2 sample consisted of 744 CHR youth and 276 healthy controls. Only 21% of the CHR group did not have a comorbid diagnosis with many have 2-3 DSM-IV comorbid diagnoses. The most common diagnoses were anxiety and depressive disorders, which did improve over time. The only diagnosis at baseline that differentiated the converters from the non-converters was cannabis misuse. Comorbidity, except for cannabis use, was essentially independent of clinical outcome. It is possible that those with comorbid diagnoses are preferentially the help-seeking individuals that present for help in our clinics and research projects and that those who are at risk but do not have a comorbid diagnosis may not be seeking help in the prodromal phase.

摘要

多项研究表明,有临床发展为精神病高风险(CHR)的年轻人患有多种合并精神疾病的发病率很高。关于合并诊断对后来转为精神病的影响以及随时间变化的情况知之甚少。本研究的目的是确定北美前驱纵向研究(NAPLS 2)中基线时和随时间变化的精神疾病诊断的频率和分布,以及合并诊断在转为精神病中的作用。NAPLS 2 样本包括 744 名 CHR 年轻人和 276 名健康对照。只有 21%的 CHR 组没有合并诊断,许多人有 2-3 种 DSM-IV 合并诊断。最常见的诊断是焦虑和抑郁障碍,这些障碍随着时间的推移有所改善。基线时唯一能区分转化者和非转化者的诊断是大麻滥用。除大麻使用外,合并症基本上与临床结果无关。可能是那些有合并症诊断的人更倾向于在我们的诊所和研究项目中寻求帮助,而那些有风险但没有合并症诊断的人可能不会在前驱期寻求帮助。

相似文献

1
Comorbid diagnoses for youth at clinical high risk of psychosis.
Schizophr Res. 2017 Dec;190:90-95. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2017.03.043. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
3
Anxiety in youth at clinical high risk for psychosis.
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2017 Dec;11(6):480-487. doi: 10.1111/eip.12274. Epub 2015 Oct 12.
6
[Which psychiatric comorbidities in cannabis dependence during adolescence? Comparison of outpatients and controls].
Encephale. 2018 Feb;44(1):2-8. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2016.05.013. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
7
Predicting psychosis in a general adolescent psychiatric sample.
Schizophr Res. 2014 Sep;158(1-3):1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2014.06.028. Epub 2014 Jul 9.
8
Clinical Profiles and Conversion Rates Among Young Individuals With Autism Spectrum Disorder Who Present to Clinical High Risk for Psychosis Services.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2019 Jun;58(6):582-588. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2018.09.446. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
9
Specificity of Incident Diagnostic Outcomes in Patients at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis.
Schizophr Bull. 2015 Sep;41(5):1066-75. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbv091.

引用本文的文献

1
Baseline Clinical Characterization of Participants in the Accelerating Medicines Partnership Schizophrenia Program.
Schizophr Bull Open. 2025 Aug 25;6(1):sgaf012. doi: 10.1093/schizbullopen/sgaf012. eCollection 2025 Jan.
4
Transdiagnostic modeling of clinician-rated symptoms in affective and nonaffective psychotic disorders.
J Psychopathol Clin Sci. 2025 Jan;134(1):81-96. doi: 10.1037/abn0000958. Epub 2024 Oct 24.
5
7
Mapping Psychosis Risk States onto the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology Using Hierarchical Symptom Dimensions.
Clin Psychol Sci. 2024 Jan;12(1):3-21. doi: 10.1177/21677026221146178. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
8
The hierarchical taxonomy of psychopathology in clinical high risk for psychosis: Validation and extension.
J Psychopathol Clin Sci. 2024 Apr;133(3):235-244. doi: 10.1037/abn0000893. Epub 2024 Mar 28.
10
On the proportion of patients who experience a prodrome prior to psychosis onset: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Mol Psychiatry. 2024 May;29(5):1361-1381. doi: 10.1038/s41380-024-02415-w. Epub 2024 Feb 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Long-term validity of the At Risk Mental State (ARMS) for predicting psychotic and non-psychotic mental disorders.
Eur Psychiatry. 2017 May;42:49-54. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2016.11.010. Epub 2016 Dec 6.
2
Deconstructing Pretest Risk Enrichment to Optimize Prediction of Psychosis in Individuals at Clinical High Risk.
JAMA Psychiatry. 2016 Dec 1;73(12):1260-1267. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.2707.
4
Evaluating the relationship between cannabis use and IQ in youth and young adults at clinical high risk of psychosis.
Psychiatry Res. 2015 Dec 30;230(3):878-84. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2015.11.033. Epub 2015 Nov 25.
6
Cannabis use and transition to psychosis in individuals at ultra-high risk: review and meta-analysis.
Psychol Med. 2016 Mar;46(4):673-81. doi: 10.1017/S0033291715002329. Epub 2015 Nov 16.
7
Anxiety in youth at clinical high risk for psychosis.
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2017 Dec;11(6):480-487. doi: 10.1111/eip.12274. Epub 2015 Oct 12.
8
Specificity of Incident Diagnostic Outcomes in Patients at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis.
Schizophr Bull. 2015 Sep;41(5):1066-75. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbv091.
9
Why are help-seeking subjects at ultra-high risk for psychosis help-seeking?
Psychiatry Res. 2015 Aug 30;228(3):808-15. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2015.05.018. Epub 2015 May 30.
10
North American Prodrome Longitudinal Study (NAPLS 2): The Prodromal Symptoms.
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2015 May;203(5):328-35. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000290.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验