• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Transdiagnostic modeling of clinician-rated symptoms in affective and nonaffective psychotic disorders.情感性和非情感性精神障碍中临床医生评定症状的跨诊断模型构建
J Psychopathol Clin Sci. 2025 Jan;134(1):81-96. doi: 10.1037/abn0000958. Epub 2024 Oct 24.
2
Characterization of affective domains within the nonaffective psychotic disorders.非情感性精神障碍中情感领域的特征描述。
Schizophr Res. 2009 Jun;111(1-3):61-9. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2009.03.008. Epub 2009 Mar 24.
3
Exploring the borders of the schizoaffective spectrum: a categorical and dimensional approach.探索分裂情感性谱系的边界:一种分类与维度方法。
J Affect Disord. 2008 May;108(1-2):71-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2007.09.009. Epub 2007 Oct 29.
4
Transdiagnostic dimensions of psychopathology at first episode psychosis: findings from the multinational EU-GEI study.首发精神病患者精神病理学的跨诊断维度:来自多国 EU-GEI 研究的结果。
Psychol Med. 2019 Jun;49(8):1378-1391. doi: 10.1017/S0033291718002131. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
5
Bifactor Modeling of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale: Generalized Psychosis Spans Schizoaffective, Bipolar, and Schizophrenia Diagnoses.双因素模型对阳性和阴性综合征量表的分析:广义精神病涵盖了精神分裂症谱系障碍、双相情感障碍和精神分裂症的诊断。
Schizophr Bull. 2018 Oct 17;44(6):1204-1216. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbx163.
6
Mood Symptoms in Stabilized Patients with Schizophrenia: A Bipolar Type with Predominant Psychotic Features?病情稳定的精神分裂症患者的情绪症状:一种以精神病性特征为主的双相类型?
Psychiatr Danub. 2017 Jun;29(2):148-154. doi: 10.24869/psyd.2017.148.
7
Factor structure of symptoms in functional psychoses.功能性精神病症状的因子结构
Biol Psychiatry. 1997 Nov 1;42(9):806-15. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(96)00496-9.
8
Boundaries of schizoaffective disorder: revisiting Kraepelin.分裂情感性障碍的边界:重新审视克雷丕林。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2013 Dec;70(12):1276-86. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.2350.
9
Geographic variation and sociodemographic characteristics of psychotic disorders in Finland.芬兰精神病性障碍的地理差异及社会人口学特征
Schizophr Res. 2008 Dec;106(2-3):337-47. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2008.08.017. Epub 2008 Sep 18.
10
Diagnostic Stability of ICD/DSM First Episode Psychosis Diagnoses: Meta-analysis.国际疾病分类/精神疾病诊断与统计手册首次发作精神病诊断的诊断稳定性:荟萃分析
Schizophr Bull. 2016 Nov;42(6):1395-1406. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbw020. Epub 2016 Mar 15.

本文引用的文献

1
The need for evidence-based updating of ICD and DSM models of psychotic and mood disorders.基于证据对国际疾病分类(ICD)和精神疾病诊断与统计手册(DSM)中精神病性和心境障碍模型进行更新的必要性。
Mol Psychiatry. 2023 May;28(5):1836-1838. doi: 10.1038/s41380-023-01967-7. Epub 2023 Jan 25.
2
Perifornical area Urocortin-3 neuronal activation levels in response to foreign pups depends on physiological context.穹窿周区促肾上腺皮质激素释放激素-3神经元对外来幼崽反应的激活水平取决于生理背景。
Mol Psychiatry. 2023 Jan;28(1):1. doi: 10.1038/s41380-022-01915-x.
3
Clinical Features of Psychotic Disorders: Comparing Categorical and Dimensional Models.精神障碍的临床特征:比较分类模型和维度模型
Psychiatr Res Clin Pract. 2020 Oct 9;3(1):29-37. doi: 10.1176/appi.prcp.20190053. eCollection 2021 Spring.
4
Reconceptualizing schizophrenia in the Hierarchical Taxonomy Of Psychopathology (HiTOP).在精神病理学层次分类法(HiTOP)中对精神分裂症进行重新概念化。
Schizophr Res. 2022 Apr;242:73-77. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2022.01.053. Epub 2022 Feb 7.
5
Use of DSM-5 diagnoses vs. other clinical information by US academic-affiliated psychiatrists in assessing and treating psychotic disorders.美国学术附属精神病医生在评估和治疗精神障碍时使用《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM-5)诊断与其他临床信息的情况。
World Psychiatry. 2021 Oct;20(3):447-448. doi: 10.1002/wps.20903.
6
Alternative Diagnostic Models of the Psychotic Disorders: Evidence-Based Choices.精神障碍的替代诊断模型:基于证据的选择。
Psychother Psychosom. 2021;90(6):373-385. doi: 10.1159/000517027. Epub 2021 Jul 7.
7
Development of the Thought Disorder Measure for the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology.精神病理学层级分类思维障碍度量表的发展。
Assessment. 2022 Jan;29(1):46-61. doi: 10.1177/10731911211015355. Epub 2021 May 28.
8
Meta-analysis of structural evidence for the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) model.对心理病理学分层分类体系(HiTOP)模型的结构证据进行的荟萃分析。
Psychol Med. 2023 Jan;53(2):533-546. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721001902. Epub 2021 May 14.
9
Using anticlustering to partition data sets into equivalent parts.使用反聚类方法将数据集划分为等效部分。
Psychol Methods. 2021 Apr;26(2):161-174. doi: 10.1037/met0000301. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
10
Appropriate Use of Bifactor Analysis in Psychopathology Research: Appreciating Benefits and Limitations.双因素分析在精神病理学研究中的恰当运用:认识其优势与局限。
Biol Psychiatry. 2020 Jul 1;88(1):18-27. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2020.01.013. Epub 2020 Jan 28.

情感性和非情感性精神障碍中临床医生评定症状的跨诊断模型构建

Transdiagnostic modeling of clinician-rated symptoms in affective and nonaffective psychotic disorders.

作者信息

Chung Yoonho, Girard Jeffrey M, Ravichandran Caitlin, Öngür Dost, Cohen Bruce M, Baker Justin T

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School.

Department of Psychology, University of Kansas.

出版信息

J Psychopathol Clin Sci. 2025 Jan;134(1):81-96. doi: 10.1037/abn0000958. Epub 2024 Oct 24.

DOI:10.1037/abn0000958
PMID:39446623
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11747831/
Abstract

Prevailing factor models of psychosis are centered on schizophrenia-related disorders defined by the and , restricting generalizability to other clinical presentations featuring psychosis, even though affective psychoses are more common. This study aims to bridge this gap by conducting exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, utilizing clinical ratings collected from patients with either affective or nonaffective psychoses ( = 1,042). Drawing from established clinical instruments, such as the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, Young Mania Rating Scale, and Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale, a broad spectrum of core psychotic symptoms was considered for the model development. Among the candidate models considered, including correlated factors and multifactor models, a model with seven correlated factors encompassing positive symptoms, negative symptoms, depression, mania, disorganization, hostility, and anxiety was most interpretable with acceptable fit. The seven factors exhibited expected associations with external validators, were replicable through cross-validation, and were generalizable across affective and nonaffective psychoses. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

当前的精神病因素模型主要围绕由[具体标准1]和[具体标准2]定义的精神分裂症相关障碍展开,即便情感性精神病更为常见,其可推广性仍局限于以精神病为特征的其他临床表现。本研究旨在通过进行探索性和验证性因素分析来弥合这一差距,分析时利用从情感性或非情感性精神病患者(n = 1042)收集的临床评分。借鉴如阳性和阴性症状量表、杨氏躁狂评定量表以及蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表等既定临床工具,模型构建考虑了广泛的核心精神病症状。在考虑的候选模型中,包括相关因素模型和多因素模型,一个包含阳性症状、阴性症状、抑郁、躁狂、紊乱、敌意和焦虑的七因素相关模型具有可接受的拟合度且最具解释力。这七个因素与外部验证指标呈现出预期的关联,可通过交叉验证进行复制,并且在情感性和非情感性精神病中具有可推广性。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2025美国心理学会,保留所有权利)