a School of Psychology , University of Buenos Aires , Argentina.
b Center for the Study of Stress, Trauma, and Resilience, Department of Counseling and Psychological Services , Georgia State University.
J Pers Assess. 2018 Mar-Apr;100(2):219-230. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2017.1296845. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
The Revised Almost Perfect Scale (APS-R; Slaney, Mobley, Trippi, Ashby, & Johnson, 1996 ) was designed to measure perfectionistic strivings (standards), perfectionistic concerns (discrepancy), and preferences for neatness and organization (order). In this study, English and Spanish (Arana, Keegan, & Rutsztein, 2009 ) versions of the APS-R were compared in samples of 283 college students in Argentina and 311 U.S. students. The results offered support for cross-national scalar invariance for discrepancy and order items but standards items, with a few exceptions, raised concerns about their cross-national comparability. Tests of latent means revealed no differences between the countries for discrepancy, but the order factor mean was higher in the U.S.
Age and gender had negligible effects on measurement models. Discrepancy was strongly related to depressive symptoms for both samples. Unlike in the U.S. sample, there was a significant association for the Argentina sample between standards and discrepancy. Overall, results indicated that discrepancy items performed well, order items were adequate with some measurement adjustments, and standards items should be revisited for their cross-cultural utility. Translation issues and general values in Argentina and the United States (e.g., collectivism-individualism) are discussed that might affect how perfectionism is understood and measured in different cultural contexts.
修订后的近乎完美量表(APS-R;Slaney、Mobley、Trippi、Ashby 和 Johnson,1996)旨在衡量完美主义的努力(标准)、完美主义的担忧(差异)以及对整洁和组织的偏好(秩序)。在这项研究中,对来自阿根廷的 283 名大学生和美国的 311 名大学生样本中,比较了 APS-R 的英文和西班牙文(Arana、Keegan 和 Rutsztein,2009)版本。结果支持差异和秩序项目的跨国标度不变性,但标准项目存在一些问题,这令人对其跨国可比性表示担忧。潜在均值的检验表明,两国之间在差异方面没有差异,但美国的秩序因素均值较高。
年龄和性别对测量模型的影响可以忽略不计。对于两个样本,差异与抑郁症状都有很强的相关性。与美国样本不同,阿根廷样本中标准和差异之间存在显著关联。总的来说,结果表明差异项目表现良好,秩序项目在进行一些测量调整后是足够的,而标准项目应该重新考虑其跨文化效用。讨论了阿根廷和美国的翻译问题和一般价值观(例如,集体主义-个人主义),这些可能会影响不同文化背景下对完美主义的理解和衡量。