Schulman Allison R, Ryou Marvin, Chan Walter W
1 Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital , Boston, Massachusetts.
2 Harvard Medical School , Boston, Massachusetts.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017 Jun;27(6):564-570. doi: 10.1089/lap.2016.0649. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
Colonoscopy outcome is limited by endoscope looping, which leads to patient discomfort, prolonged procedure, and increased sedation requirement. Traditional manual abdominal pressure is imprecise and manually intensive. A hands-free abdominal compression device (ACD) may improve colonoscopy outcome. We aimed to assess the effect of a novel ACD on colonoscopy outcomes compared to manual pressure.
This was a prospective single-blinded study of patients undergoing outpatient colonoscopy. The ACD (N-Doe Pillow™) was applied on 50 consecutive patients. Endoscopists were blinded to device usage. Control cases using manual pressure were randomly selected in a 2:1 manner. Primary outcome was cecal intubation time. Secondary outcomes included sedation requirement and complications. Subgroup analyses evaluated ACD effect on endoscopists with different experiences and patients at higher risk of difficult colonoscopy. Fisher's exact and Student's t-tests were performed for univariate analyses. Multivariate analysis was performed using generalized linear regression.
Fifty patients undergoing colonoscopy with ACD assistance were compared to 100 matched controls. Mean cecal intubation time was significantly reduced in the ACD group compared to controls (6.38 minutes versus 11.8 minutes, P < .0001). Multivariate analysis showed that ACD use was independently associated with reduction in cecal intubation time (β-coeff: -4.11, P = .007). Subgroup analyses revealed a trend toward increased improvement in cecal intubation time among junior endoscopists and obese patients.
A novel, hands-free ACD significantly decreased cecal intubation time in this prospective, single-blinded, match-controlled study. A trend toward more improvement was seen among junior faculty, suggesting an application for trainees and/or endoscopists with smaller case volumes.
结肠镜检查的结果受内镜成袢的限制,这会导致患者不适、检查时间延长以及镇静需求增加。传统的手动腹部按压不精确且需大量人力。一种免提式腹部压迫装置(ACD)可能会改善结肠镜检查的结果。我们旨在评估一种新型ACD与手动按压相比对结肠镜检查结果的影响。
这是一项对接受门诊结肠镜检查患者的前瞻性单盲研究。连续50例患者使用了ACD(N-Doe Pillow™)。内镜医师对装置的使用情况不知情。以2:1的比例随机选择使用手动按压的对照病例。主要结局是盲肠插管时间。次要结局包括镇静需求和并发症。亚组分析评估了ACD对不同经验的内镜医师以及结肠镜检查难度较高风险患者的影响。进行Fisher精确检验和Student t检验用于单因素分析。使用广义线性回归进行多因素分析。
将50例接受ACD辅助结肠镜检查的患者与100例匹配的对照进行比较。与对照组相比,ACD组的平均盲肠插管时间显著缩短(6.38分钟对11.8分钟,P <.0001)。多因素分析表明,使用ACD与盲肠插管时间的缩短独立相关(β系数:-4.11,P =.007)。亚组分析显示,初级内镜医师和肥胖患者的盲肠插管时间改善趋势增加。
在这项前瞻性、单盲、匹配对照研究中,一种新型的免提式ACD显著缩短了盲肠插管时间。初级内镜医师中有更多改善的趋势,这表明该装置适用于病例量较少的实习生和/或内镜医师。