Conrad Kendon J, Iris Madelyn, Liu Pi-Ju
a School of Public Health (Emeritus) , University of Illinois at Chicago , Chicago , Illinois , USA.
b Chestnut Health Systems , Normal , Illinois , USA.
J Elder Abuse Negl. 2017 Mar;29(2-3):134-156. doi: 10.1080/08946566.2017.1314843.
The Elder Abuse Decision Support System was designed to meet the critical need for improved methods for assessment and substantiation of elder mistreatment, using a web-based system with standardized measures. Six Illinois agencies participated in the field test. One-year pre/post analyses assessed substantiation results, using Illinois' standard investigation procedure as a comparison. Pre/post acceptability was assessed with caseworkers in focus groups with adult protective service staff. Validity of measures was assessed using Cronbach's alpha and receiver operator characteristic curve analyses with final substantiation decision as a criterion. Increased substantiation of abuse was found. Regarding acceptability, the two systems were found to have differing strengths and weaknesses. Outcome measures had high validity estimates, while focus groups indicated directions for improvement. This study was a successful proof of concept that data collected in the field would be useful for clinical purposes as well as for research.
老年人虐待决策支持系统旨在满足对改进老年人虐待评估和证实方法的迫切需求,该系统使用基于网络的系统并采用标准化措施。六个伊利诺伊州的机构参与了实地测试。采用一年前后分析来评估证实结果,并将伊利诺伊州的标准调查程序作为对照。通过与成人保护服务人员进行焦点小组访谈,让个案工作者评估前后的可接受性。以最终的证实决定为标准,使用克朗巴哈系数和受试者工作特征曲线分析来评估措施的有效性。发现虐待行为的证实有所增加。在可接受性方面,发现这两个系统各有优缺点。结果测量具有较高的有效性估计值,而焦点小组指出了改进方向。这项研究是一个成功的概念验证,即实地收集的数据可用于临床目的以及研究。