• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Use of Propensity Scores To Design Observational Comparative Effectiveness Studies.使用倾向得分设计观察性比较效果研究。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017 Aug 1;109(8). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djw345.
2
Applications of propensity score methods in observational comparative effectiveness and safety research: where have we come and where should we go?倾向评分法在观察性比较有效性和安全性研究中的应用：我们已经走到哪里，应该走向何方？
J Comp Eff Res. 2014 Jan;3(1):63-78. doi: 10.2217/cer.13.89. Epub 2013 Nov 22.
3
Regulatory considerations in the design of comparative observational studies using propensity scores.使用倾向评分设计比较性观察性研究时的监管考量
J Biopharm Stat. 2012;22(6):1272-9. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2012.715111.
4
Propensity score models in observational comparative effectiveness studies: cornerstone of design or statistical afterthought?观察性比较有效性研究中的倾向评分模型：设计的基石还是统计上的事后想法？
J Comp Eff Res. 2012 Mar;1(2):129-35. doi: 10.2217/cer.12.4.
5
Handling missing data in propensity score estimation in comparative effectiveness evaluations: a systematic review.比较效果评估中倾向评分估计里缺失数据的处理：一项系统综述
J Comp Eff Res. 2018 Mar;7(3):271-279. doi: 10.2217/cer-2017-0071. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
6
Propensity scores for comparative effectiveness research: Finding the right match.
Surgery. 2016 Dec;160(6):1425-1426. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.05.045. Epub 2016 Jul 30.
7
[The propensity score method and it's application].[倾向评分法及其应用]
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2019 Jul 6;53(7):752-756. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-9624.2019.07.017.
8
Comparing drug effectiveness in children: A systematic review.比较儿童用药的有效性：一项系统评价。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2018 Dec;27(12):1295-1301. doi: 10.1002/pds.4676. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
9
Performing both propensity score and instrumental variable analyses in observational studies often leads to discrepant results: a systematic review.在观察性研究中同时进行倾向评分分析和工具变量分析常常导致结果不一致：一项系统评价。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Oct;68(10):1232-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.04.003. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
10
Propensity Score-Based Methods in Comparative Effectiveness Research on Coronary Artery Disease.基于倾向评分的冠状动脉疾病药物比较效果研究方法。
Am J Epidemiol. 2018 May 1;187(5):1064-1078. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwx214.

引用本文的文献

1
Association between intraoperative steroid and postoperative mortality in patients undergoing craniotomy for brain tumor.脑肿瘤开颅手术患者术中使用类固醇与术后死亡率之间的关联。
Front Neurol. 2023 Jun 29;14:1153392. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1153392. eCollection 2023.
2
Ten Rules for Conducting Retrospective Pharmacoepidemiological Analyses: Example COVID-19 Study.进行回顾性药物流行病学分析的十条规则：以COVID-19研究为例
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Jul 28;12:700776. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.700776. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Reporting and Guidelines in Propensity Score Analysis: A Systematic Review of Cancer and Cancer Surgical Studies.倾向得分分析中的报告与指南：癌症及癌症外科研究的系统评价
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017 Aug 1;109(8). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djw323.
2
The active comparator, new user study design in pharmacoepidemiology: historical foundations and contemporary application.药物流行病学中的活性对照、新用户研究设计：历史基础与当代应用。
Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2015 Dec;2(4):221-228. doi: 10.1007/s40471-015-0053-5. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
3
Metformin and the risk of cancer: time-related biases in observational studies.二甲双胍与癌症风险：观察性研究中的时间相关性偏倚。
Diabetes Care. 2012 Dec;35(12):2665-73. doi: 10.2337/dc12-0788.
4
Clinical referral patterns for carotid artery stenting versus carotid endarterectomy: results from the Carotid Artery Revascularization and Endarterectomy Registry.颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术的临床转诊模式：来自颈动脉血运重建和内膜切除术登记处的结果。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Feb 1;4(1):88-94. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.110.958843. Epub 2011 Jan 11.
5
Treatment effects in the presence of unmeasured confounding: dealing with observations in the tails of the propensity score distribution--a simulation study.存在未测量混杂时的处理效应：处理倾向评分分布尾部的观测值——一项模拟研究。
Am J Epidemiol. 2010 Oct 1;172(7):843-54. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwq198. Epub 2010 Aug 17.
6
On the limitations of comparative effectiveness research.论比较效果研究的局限性。
Stat Med. 2010 Aug 30;29(19):1991-5; discussion 1996-7. doi: 10.1002/sim.3960.
7
Different methods of balancing covariates leading to different effect estimates in the presence of effect modification.在存在效应修正的情况下，不同的协变量平衡方法会导致不同的效应估计值。
Am J Epidemiol. 2009 Apr 1;169(7):909-17. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwn391. Epub 2009 Jan 19.
8
Immortal time bias in pharmaco-epidemiology.药物流行病学中的不朽时间偏倚。
Am J Epidemiol. 2008 Feb 15;167(4):492-9. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwm324. Epub 2007 Dec 3.
9
Increasing levels of restriction in pharmacoepidemiologic database studies of elderly and comparison with randomized trial results.老年人群药物流行病学数据库研究中限制水平的提高及其与随机试验结果的比较。
Med Care. 2007 Oct;45(10 Supl 2):S131-42. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318070c08e.
10
The design versus the analysis of observational studies for causal effects: parallels with the design of randomized trials.观察性研究因果效应的设计与分析：与随机试验设计的相似之处。
Stat Med. 2007 Jan 15;26(1):20-36. doi: 10.1002/sim.2739.

Use of Propensity Scores To Design Observational Comparative Effectiveness Studies.

作者信息

Glynn Robert J

机构信息

Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017 Aug 1;109(8). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djw345.

DOI:10.1093/jnci/djw345
PMID:28376196
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7053536/
Abstract
摘要