Mayo Clinic Medical School & the Division of Health Care Policy & Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
J Comp Eff Res. 2014 Jan;3(1):63-78. doi: 10.2217/cer.13.89. Epub 2013 Nov 22.
Propensity score (PS) methods have proliferated in recent years in observational studies in general and in observational comparative effectiveness research (CER) in particular. PS methods are an important set of tools for estimating treatment effects in observational studies, enabling adjustment for measured confounders in an easy-to-understand and transparent way. This article demonstrates how PS methods have been used to address specific CER questions from 2001 through to 2012 by identifying six impactful studies from this period. This article also discusses areas for improvement, including data infrastructure, and a unified set of guidelines in terms of PS implementation and reporting, which will boost confidence in evidence generated through observational CER using PS methods.
近年来,倾向评分(PS)方法在一般观察性研究中,尤其是在观察性比较有效性研究(CER)中大量涌现。PS 方法是一种重要的工具,用于在观察性研究中估计治疗效果,能够以易于理解和透明的方式调整已测量的混杂因素。本文通过确定该时期的六项有影响力的研究,展示了 PS 方法如何用于解决 2001 年至 2012 年期间的特定 CER 问题。本文还讨论了改进的领域,包括数据基础设施以及在 PS 实施和报告方面的一套统一准则,这将增强对使用 PS 方法进行的观察性 CER 产生的证据的信心。